Mister T
Elder Member
The prisoner section of the ARLRB is far from being clear in many respects. I very much doubt that the drafters had the llmc situation in mind when they used such non-indexed wording. Ok, there is a reasoning behind Justiciar's argument but i find it casuistic.
Bottom line is that a leader has been eliminated ("and any other cause") and this triggers the LLMC provisions, whether the leader has been gunned down at the beginning of his surrendering, during his run or in the hands of the enemy, it doesn't matter because surrender involves no movement (they avoid shells, mines, etc.).
If a leader were to eliminated by FtR, LLMC would also kick in.
Anyway, a Q&A would be the way to go to settle the issue.
Bottom line is that a leader has been eliminated ("and any other cause") and this triggers the LLMC provisions, whether the leader has been gunned down at the beginning of his surrendering, during his run or in the hands of the enemy, it doesn't matter because surrender involves no movement (they avoid shells, mines, etc.).
If a leader were to eliminated by FtR, LLMC would also kick in.
Anyway, a Q&A would be the way to go to settle the issue.