...BTW, a little trick. Shoot at it with an MG as ordinance. If you score a hit, ? is stripped, even if it's a Stalin III!
Unfortunately, it has been ruled that a MG (at least non-vehicular) may not make a TH/TK attempt on a concealed target.
A9.61:
"...Such an attack must be made within Normal Range of the MG,
without any form of halved FP penalty imposed, and predesignated as an AFV To Kill attack vs a specific AFV. If hit in an unarmored Target Facing,..."
Q&A:
A9.61
A9.61 indicates that an MG TH vs. an AFV must be “without any form of halved FP penalty imposed”, given Ordnance is never
halved, does that imply the halved FP penalty should be considered as if the MG was firing on the IFT instead? E.g. can a MG TH
attempt target a concealed AFV? On the IFT normally the FP would be halved, but as ordnance case K applies instead. Or if the
MG is pinned is a TH allowed?
A. Anything that would halve MG FP prohibits a MG TH attempt, e.g., in AFPh,
vs “?”, pinned Infantry, etc.
Personally I think that
A9.61 primarily is referring to the status of the firer that imposes halved FP - not that of the target.