Interest in non-historical scenarios?

Kijug

Member
Joined
May 30, 2008
Messages
91
Reaction score
37
Location
Texas
Country
llUnited States
Dunno if this has been discussed before, but are any folks interested in non-historical scenarios? I'm thinking anywhere from basic skirmishes to using terrain and perhaps HASL features in non-historical settings. Various combatants not normally against each other. Combos of toys not historically correct. Etc., etc. Lots of ideas, but wondered, so long as the scenario was playable and play testing gets the players basically event, would that be enjoyable? Or do all scenarios have to be historical?

Just wondered....
 

A_T_Great

Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2011
Messages
264
Reaction score
109
Location
Maine
Country
llUnited States
Dunno if this has been discussed before, but are any folks interested in non-historical scenarios? I'm thinking anywhere from basic skirmishes to using terrain and perhaps HASL features in non-historical settings. Various combatants not normally against each other. Combos of toys not historically correct. Etc., etc. Lots of ideas, but wondered, so long as the scenario was playable and play testing gets the players basically event, would that be enjoyable? Or do all scenarios have to be historical?

Just wondered....
For your interest
 

hayman

Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2008
Messages
607
Reaction score
196
Location
Sydney
Country
llAustralia
Coming from a player who likes the historical aspect of ASL (and other games), I personally would not be interested in 'non-historical scenarios, but...a nice little tournament-sized game (5 turn max) that can be used at a local tournament as an ice breaker on a Friday afternoon/night over a few beers may be welcome by a tournament director.
Some suggestions -
The usual: U.S. vs Soviet heavy metal clash in late '45
Battle for the bottom of the barrel: Italians vs Chinese.
Japanese vs any and all takers ;)
 

Eagle4ty

Elder Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Messages
3,910
Reaction score
1,519
Location
Eau Claire, Wi
Country
llUnited States
With geo-boards for terrain and OBs tailored with design-for-effect aspects in mind (or simply insufficient research), that's enough non-historical me. I really got into wargaming in general and ASL in particular for the "historical" aspect of the interaction and as such enjoy the background descriptions almost as much as the actual game itself.
 
Last edited:

zgrose

Elder Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2004
Messages
3,583
Reaction score
531
Location
Kingwood, TX
First name
Zoltan
Country
llUnited States
I am interested in good, balanced scenarios. The flavor text is nice but I’ll take a good scenario over a good narrative or accurate OoB.
 

Eagle4ty

Elder Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Messages
3,910
Reaction score
1,519
Location
Eau Claire, Wi
Country
llUnited States
I am interested in good, balanced scenarios. The flavor text is nice but I’ll take a good scenario over a good narrative or accurate OoB.
Yes, that's the great thing about ASL; one can have a passing interest in the history and enjoy the flavor of the game with all its intricacies or have and real interest in the history and enjoy the challenge of a reflective history experience with the game.:)
 

Paul M. Weir

Forum Guru
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
8,327
Reaction score
3,302
Location
Dublin
First name
Paul
Country
llIreland
I've always viewed ASL as a great big WW2-ish toybox. As I have mentioned before I'm a dilettante solo player, my real joy is the historical research (equipment, OOB, etc). Over the decades I have cooked up many non-historical clashes for myself. Some have been ahistorical sides (eg Patton vs Katukov '45), some were clashes that could have, but didn't happen. One area that I did mess around a lot was some thing like a late-'41 Soviet Tank Brigade vs a '41 Panzer Abteilung, just to get a handle on relative strengths and weaknesses.

If you think about what historical scenarios have been put out, most of those have been trimmed on one side or the other for balance or counter limitation reasons. The times I tried my hand with historical OOBs, the result was mainly unbalanced dogs. That is unsurprising as real life commanders don't like evenly matched stalemates, unlike us game players.
 

Gordon

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2017
Messages
596
Reaction score
493
Country
llUnited States
Indeed, one of Nicholas Moran's (The Chieftain online) points is that the reason everyone says it took 5 Shermans to kill a Panther is that if a unit called back up the chain of command because they were facing a tank, a platoon of Shermans was sent, which was the base tactical unit. You'd never send just a single sherman.
 

Swiftandsure

Robin Reeve
Silver Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2003
Messages
16,456
Reaction score
2,019
Location
St-Légier
First name
Robin
Country
llSwitzerland
DYO would be the best way to play non historical situations.
Having designers spend time on non historical concepts would be a waste of energy and of time, IMO.
Perhaps with the exception of the odd Zombie pack or a what-if in the style of Seelöwe, which some may be interested in.
I personally am not.
 
Top