Infantry Combat ?

junk2drive

Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
897
Reaction score
7
Location
Arizona West Coast
It's not 1:1

It doesn't have the animations that some people need for immersion.

It works fairly well for me. It is abstract, uses step losses, doesn't count men or type of arms, doesn't have ranking officers.
 

Redwolf

Member # 3665
Joined
Sep 2, 2002
Messages
5,113
Reaction score
44
Location
MA, USA
Country
llUnited States
It's not 1:1

It doesn't have the animations that some people need for immersion.

It works fairly well for me. It is abstract, uses step losses, doesn't count men or type of arms, doesn't have ranking officers.
Good. It works much better that way.
 

ksbearski

Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2006
Messages
91
Reaction score
3
Location
Kansas
Country
llUnited States
It's not 1:1

It doesn't have the animations that some people need for immersion.

It works fairly well for me. It is abstract, uses step losses, doesn't count men or type of arms, doesn't have ranking officers.
Thanks for the breakdown of what's wrong. Although I don't see anything wrong with it either...
 

Blackcloud6

Elder Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2004
Messages
6,845
Reaction score
594
Location
New Baltimore, MI
Country
llUnited States
It's not 1:1

It doesn't have the animations that some people need for immersion.

It works fairly well for me. It is abstract, uses step losses, doesn't count men or type of arms, doesn't have ranking officers.
Are people trying to compare it to CM?
 

ksbearski

Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2006
Messages
91
Reaction score
3
Location
Kansas
Country
llUnited States
Are people trying to compare it to CM?
Yes, I would agree. Comparisons are/were inevitable...

Two different concepts for which I have written an equation for:

ASL does not equal Panzer Leader/Panzerblitz

If ASL= CMBN and PCO = Panzer Leader/Panzerblitz, then CMBN does not equal PCO.

My variables date me...

ksbearski:laugh:
 
Last edited:
Top