Yes, the crew was subject to a -2 bailing out because it passed a CS roll .. I'm about 75% sure that the AFV TEM doesn't apply to bailing out crews, but does to unloading crews/passengers.
But, I was just thinking about this situation this morning. Originally the Ldr+FT and 468 squad were armor-assaulting up to the point when their tank got whacked by the ATG. Now, for the attack immediately after this, when I fired the Carrier(B) AAMG for 6 even/-1/-2:
1) are the leader+FT and sqd still considered to be armor assaulting under a (now) wrecked tank? (in other words would the +1 vehicle TEM still be applicable?). If not, the subsequent aamg attack would've been 6 -3/-2/-2 (ffmo and ffnam now factored in) And,
2) If yes to 1, is the entire group (Ldr+FT, sqd, and bailing-out crew) actually an eligible group (stack) target? or must the carrier designate its shot separately between bailing-out crew *or* the Ldr+FT & sqd? Without checking the rule book, I would think the crew is still part of the tank while bailing out and the Ldr+FT & sqd are still armor assaulting, thus one eligible group target of 3 units. After all, if the hex was fired on later in the Defensive Fire phase for Final Fire then all 3 units in the location would be affected .. Now, I do recollect somewhere that vehicles/wrecks are not considered TEM during a turn in which they moved or were in motion until after the ADVph in which they stopped. So, for fire against those three targets in the DEF fire phase, the +1 AFV TEM would not apply (they are no longer armor-assaulting). Of course they aren't inhibited by FFNM either, so it all comes out in the wash.
If anyone knows for sure, I'd appreciate rules references, so I can double-check on my own later on tonight when I have more time.