As it was before present owner?Why couldn’t there be a section where people can get into whatever disagreement they want to as long as they keep it civil and stay within that section.
As it was before present owner?Why couldn’t there be a section where people can get into whatever disagreement they want to as long as they keep it civil and stay within that section.
Or mebbe it was just "9 lives"-Vinnie who survived yet another attempt to shoot him and the stray bullet hit someone else...I think that he managed to shoot himself without anybody helping him.
The 'keep it civil' part is the one where too many failed miserably in the suspended 'Political Section' for starters.Why couldn’t there be a section where people can get into whatever disagreement they want to as long as they keep it civil and stay within that section.
I feel some of it was due to people liking the feeling of getting under another’s skin.The 'keep it civil' part is the one where too many failed miserably in the suspended 'Political Section' for starters.
von Marwitz
Whatever the case, I ain't missing the 'Political Section'.I feel some of it was due to people liking the feeling of getting under another’s skin.
Not really putting forward a valid point but just starting an issue to watch it burn.
Isn’t that nice to feel free to say.Whatever the case, I ain't missing the 'Political Section'.
von Marwitz
...and that is how it is done.Personally the political forum could of stayed as I never looked at it as it held no interest to me so why look ?
The point, as far as I’m concerned, is that if you are interested in swimming you go to forum that focuses on swimming. Both you and I were involved in a number of debates, with others, in PSG. Debate doesn’t stop just because there isn’t sub forum to discuss completely unrelated issues to board and computer gaming. There are places where those issues can be aired. The forum is better off without it. Fewer people getting banned as wellPersonally the political forum could of stayed as I never looked at it as it held no interest to me so why look ?
What were the intentions of the original creator of the forum to include such things? Was it to create a larger sense of community? Do people speak about politics at tournaments?The point, as far as I’m concerned, is that if you are interested in swimming you go to forum that focuses on swimming. Both you and I were involved in a number of debates, with others, in PSG. Debate doesn’t stop just because there isn’t sub forum to discuss completely unrelated issues to board and computer gaming. There are places where those issues can be aired. The forum is better off without it. Fewer people getting banned as well
I got the impression that Don couldn't find another outlet/audience for his political views and thus often posted about them here or his gamesquad blog.What were the intentions of the original creator of the forum to include such things? Was it to create a larger sense of community? Do people speak about politics at tournaments?
Since I rarely if ever go to someone's profile, I've no idea how to find the stuff you're referring to. Clicking the top level links doesn't reveal anything political. Is there some super-secret sequence of buttons I'm supposed to click?I got the impression that Don couldn't find another outlet/audience for his political views and thus often posted about them here or his gamesquad blog.
See his profile here: Dr Zaius | GameSquad Forums
We are in the proofing phase at this point on #52, look for it being transmitted in 2 weeks or so.Now I remember why I am here. I am here to watch for Vic's new Dispatch issues!!
The profile link is to jog your memory, the site looked a lot different back when Don was active and there were a number of blogs which were highly profiled. The site used to have a front page and gaming articles - it actually looked a lot like grogheads.com looks today, with the forum intended to be the 'back end' where we would discuss the stuff on the front end. But over time the site kind of became an ASL forum with some other discussions thrown in and much of the marquee site content has been dispensed with.Since I rarely if ever go to someone's profile, I've no idea how to find the stuff you're referring to. Clicking the top level links doesn't reveal anything political. Is there some super-secret sequence of buttons I'm supposed to click?
Armchair general was a different forum.And I think, even before I registered here, the forum was linked to the Armchair General site?
Interesting post.The profile link is to jog your memory, the site looked a lot different back when Don was active and there were a number of blogs which were highly profiled. The site used to have a front page and gaming articles - it actually looked a lot like grogheads.com looks today, with the forum intended to be the 'back end' where we would discuss the stuff on the front end. But over time the site kind of became an ASL forum with some other discussions thrown in and much of the marquee site content has been dispensed with.
In other words, it isn't a surprise that the political forum got dissolved, but what is surprising is just how much of the other stuff has disappeared also without anyone even noticing. The front page/landing site now has a short introduction and a link directly to this forum. All the blogs, articles, etc. (where you would find the political stuff) is gone. The political stuff got - at least as I recall it - very little attention paid to it, but I suppose not much of the marquee content did either. It was a lot of work, and I think just two people were providing it - Scott Tortorice and Don.
I can't even remember all the names the site has had. Strategy Zone Online was one of them. And I think, even before I registered here, the forum was linked to the Armchair General site?