Grudge Rules as Tournament Rules

STAVKA

Elder Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2004
Messages
898
Reaction score
614
Location
East Front
Country
llFinland
Have it your way.
Note that the debate about implementing general modifications of the game rules that apply to all scenarios is quite remote from the idea of contesting the value of TD and the pain it takes to organise a tournament.
I am afraid that you are leaning, again, towards an argument of authority, rather than adressing the question.

Oh, IRL, I would adapt to the rules and regulations of a tourney.
But I would feel free to question some choices – because, you know, nobody is unfallible.
It was a joke. A TD should have a sense of humor when dealing with all different type of nerds.

As I mentioned before, if you attend and still complain it is ok. Perhaps I listen and learn if it is a complaint with substance. This thread, lack much of that, why tournament rules aint better than the original rules.
 

von Marwitz

Forum Guru
Joined
Nov 25, 2010
Messages
14,759
Reaction score
11,073
Location
Kraut Corner
Country
llUkraine
At an event if two attendees agree to not abide by the TD's SSR in their scenario should the " mutually agreed upon " clause in the ASLRB override the TDs rule?
I would say clearly yes.

The ASLRB adresses games between two players (almost exclusively) and not rules set up by TDs.
What's going on between the two players is a game of ASL between those two individuals.

von Marwitz
 

Michael R

Minor Hero
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Feb 4, 2003
Messages
4,920
Reaction score
4,647
Location
La Belle Province
First name
Michael
Country
llCanada
This discussion has prompted me to think about modifying the CASLO tournament special rule regarding OBA, which is basically the Pleva OBA rule. The TSR states that players "must use it", but I can see changing the TSR to "may use it".
 

von Marwitz

Forum Guru
Joined
Nov 25, 2010
Messages
14,759
Reaction score
11,073
Location
Kraut Corner
Country
llUkraine
when used in dice tower or free rolled the casino dice do not perform as designed and can be manipulated.
On what data, experience, or even hearsay do you base this statement?

And in what way would the performance of what the Arnhem rules consider "precision dice" deviate from the performance of casino dice in such a dicetower?

That said, notably the nature of the "required" dicetowers were not specified by the Arnhem tournament rules. If you fear performance issues with casino dice (but not "Arnhem dice") within dice towers, how come you don't fear performance issues of certain dice towers as opposed to others? Or demand some sort of "Arnhem standard precision dice tower"?

We have to remember that we are talking about the difference in outcomes between normal dice and precision dice (and dice towers for that matter...). This difference is meaningless compared to the occasion of when you make a good or bad roll in the game - boxcars make all the difference if they break your one crucial 88ATG but you could not care less whether your PIN result was anything between 8 or 12 for a 7 morale unit.

IMHO the entire precision dice issue is wholly absurd.

von Marwitz
 

klasmalmstrom

Forum Guru
Joined
Feb 26, 2003
Messages
20,097
Reaction score
7,669
Location
Sweden
Country
llSweden
This discussion has prompted me to think about modifying the CASLO tournament special rule regarding OBA, which is basically the Pleva OBA rule. The TSR states that players "must use it", but I can see changing the TSR to "may use it".
One situation you might run into is then if one player (who has the OBA probably) wants to use it and the other does not.

(As a side note, I would prefer one of the other OBA rules options presented in @Sparafucil3 's Journal article.)
 

bprobst

Elder Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2003
Messages
2,563
Reaction score
1,536
Location
Melbourne, Australia
First name
Bruce
Country
llAustralia
Just because you think them objectively stupid doesn’t mean the TD hasn’t...
I never said the TD was objectively stupid. What I said was that the impetus for these objectively stupid rules was the influence of a few people who think that modifying the rules that led to some degree of embarrassment on their part (e.g., "losing the scenario") is the only way they can compensate for said embarrassment. I'm not calling those people stupid either; I do think that their particular viewpoints are unhelpful to the ASL community (and ASL as a game).

However, I have been advised that my comments go beyond the pale and risk causing some forum members to cry (or cry out in anger), and thus I no longer feel that I can contribute meaningfully to this thread (or likely any other). I'll crawl back into my shell and let you guys fight it out.
 

carlsson

Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
328
Reaction score
245
Location
Borås, Sweden
Country
llSweden
Today, having read here about the weird dice rules at the Arnhem ASL tournament, I went to the tourney's website to read those rules. However, once there, I discovered that the rules imposed for this tournament were chock full of "grudge" rules as well.
Mark, I haven't met you personally but I think your work at desperationmorale.com is awesome! Even though I know that some people don't agree with you, and maybe I don't either at all points, it's of great value and I know that you have put a lot of work in it. Well done!

With that said, I also want to highlight the fact that it's impossible to have equal opinions on all matters – after all, that's what makes us human. The trick is to talk (aka debate) about these opinions without being rude and with respect of each others opinions.

I'll now try to explain my thoughts about this. Since you directed this thread to the AAT (Arnhem ASL Tournament) I feel that I should explain my thoughts about this since I was the Tournament Director 2024.

First, a little background about me: I am the Tournament Director of two ASL Tournaments; Supporting Fire since 2012, and The Arnhem ASL Tournament 2024. I have played ASL since late 80's and attended tournaments since 2003. I have built a large collection of thoughts and opinions about this game during the years, and I have also learned to understand why I'm playing – Because it's fun (yes, it's also fun to win, but I rather play a good game that I lose, than a boring one that I win). Ie, I'm here because I want to have a good time!

I know that many players are more competetive than me, but we are all here because we love this game. And I know that we all have our pet peeves (I have at least two more rules that should be corrected, but that's another story).

Many of the rules are influated from other tournaments, especially ASL Scandinavian Open, Stockholm ASL Tournament, Friendly Fire, Arnhem Tournament and Rimforsa. Since I think those were and are great tournaments, and I respect the people behind them, I also vaue their opinions high. They are, after all, among the best ASL players in the world.

I respect your opinion about our Tournament SSR's. There are surely tournaments that have none of that, and I would gladly attend them. However, I realize that ASL have some flaws in the rules (not many, but some), and until the changes are made official (probably never) I will do what I can to make my tournaments as enjoyable as possible for the attendees. And yes, there certainly is a will to make it more historical (eg, no truck driver ever stayed on the battle field after doing their task), but also to not destroy a game with use of game mechanics.

You call them "grudge rules". I would like to call them "Small corrections to create a better and more enjoyable game, that shouldn't impact balance in a negative way, but if used in a bad manner will destroy the game and experience".

As Bruce already have pointed out not many players care about the Tournament SSR's. In fact, during the Arnhem Tournament I never saw any dispute about this. Some people borrowed dice and towers from me, others bought them, and others didn't care. No one spoke to me about any of the SSR's or their opinion in the matter.

I have seen games destroyed by burning grain, berserk trucks, firing at huts to start blazes etc etc. The thing is, ASL have seen the development where people started to use the rules to get them to win the game. I am quite sure that Don Greenwood never Kindled buildings to win a game. The game was just not created to win at all cost, it was created to have fun. As more players sought to win games at tournaments, rules began to be bent and used in a mechanical way that was never intended.


So, here are my opinions about the SSR's from the Arnhem Tournament.
I have only commented on the rules discussed in this thread.

3. Precision Dice and Dice Tower
We would like all players to use precision dice (with dots and ball-cornered). Semi-Precision dice like Battleschool dice are not precision dice and not allowed unless you and your opponent agrees upon using them. There will be plenty of precision dice available to lend out and for sale.

We would also like all players to use a Dice tower if possible. Noisy dice equipment is NA. Dice towers are available to lend out and possibly for sale.

DICE-TOWER USAGE: When a DR or dr is made each die must, together with each other die, be rolled through the full height of the dice-tower and end its roll flat on the tower-floor. Otherwise, the entire DR or dr must be re-rolled.
(I see now that it doesn't state that "you are free to use whatever dice you want as long as you opponent is fine with that.", but rather "unless you and your opponent agrees upon using them" in a wrong context. That should be corrected.)

The reasoning behind this rule is first and foremost Balance and Speed.
Balance: By getting rid of any questions about unbalanced dice you don't need to waste any energy on that.
Speed: We have all learnt to count one to six dots and add them together extremely fast. Probably a zillion times faster than any non ASL player (I get extremely frustrated playing Monopoly at our family gatherings 😆). I love to play fast – rolling the dice and calculating the result before they dice have stopped makes my games fast, thus I can spend more time thinking about other things. If there suddenly is a hero, a flag, a wound or some other things among the dots, my games comes to a halt. Keep momentum.

This rule gives players the option to decline wooden dice, original AH dice (that rolls sixes more often than ones) and other strange dice because they want to focus on the game, not the dice. That must be a good thing, right?

If you don't like Precision Dice or Dice Towers, humbly ask your opponent if you could play with your dice. It costs you nothing and the worst thing that can happen is that you have to use you opponent's dice – Not always a bad thing.

I would like to point out that I don't control what dice the players use. As Vinnie wrote: "If one wants to and the other does not, then the TD will point to the tournament rules." I am 100% certain that none of the Arnhem attendees felt me supervising the rules (I only nagged about ending time and speed of play which also is my duty).

Edit: I would also like to point out the guideline about "noisy dice equipment". If you take a plastic box (hard pastic that really can sound a lot if you put things in it) and put your dice in it, then shake the box for 20 seconds before you stop, you will annoy not only your opponent, but everybody in the room. The same goes with big empty drinking glasses. Not very funny, and even not funnier if you have tinnitus. Just sayin'.


4. Time Limits
Players are free to take the time they feel they need to play a thoughtful and considerate game. However, excessive delay is NA. Opponents may always prompt players to move along play if they perceive the time is excessive.
Set up for either side should not be much longer than 30 min.
During each round, we will also announce the time left when we are closing in.
Note that slow playing will lead to disadvantage if the game has to be judged.
Efectiveness. I want my tournaments to be effective and enjoyable for the attendees. If one of the players are extremely slow, it will be a boring game for the other player.
All in all I had to judge one (1) game during the Arnhem tournament and IIRC there were 3 games in total decided by an agreeing dice roll.
Without this nagging about time those numbers would have been much higher.


1. Kindling
Kindling (B25.11) is NA unless specifically allowed by a scenario SSR.
This should definitely be changed in the rulebook. I have seen games wrecked because a player kindled VC areas or areas you have to pass through. All tournaments I attend to regularly have this SSR. All modern scenarios also have this SSR.

2. Offboard Artillery
When attempting Battery Access for an OBA Module and no more than one black and/or red chit(s) have been permanently removed from the Draw Pile and the second permanently-removed red chit is drawn, return it to the Draw Pile instead, and that ends the Observer’s OBA actions for that Player Turn (i.e., the second red chit can only be removed from the Draw Pile if at least two black chits have been permanently removed from the Draw Pile for that OBA Module). An Original Contact/Maintenance DR of 12 does not cause the breakdown of a Radio or elimination of a Field Phone, although an Original DR of 12 does cause the loss of Radio-/Phone-Contact.
Discussed by Jim Bishop in his OBA article in Journal 14.
Personally I use this at campaign games, but not while playing normal scenarios.
The reasoning to use this at tournaments is to make the game balanced. You should not be afraid of having OBA due to red cards or bad dice rolls.

3. Flamethrowers
Basic TK# for a FT-mounted-AFV is 6 at one hex and 4 at two hexes and 3 at three hex range. The same decreased TK# applies for an Infantry FT (i.e., 6 at one hex range and 4 at two hex range). Modifications of the Basic TK# (C7.2) apply.
FT's are way to good against AFV's in ASL if you ask me. AFAIK this is a common opinion and also used by other tournaments.

4. Vehicle Crews
Vehicle Crews can never gain Control of Terrain.
You can drive your AFV through the enemy lines, abandon your vehicle and start to take control over buildings. Something I have done myself and have seen on several occasions.
Not very historical and games can easily be destroyed.
This rule prevents that, and it's also an SSR many modern scenarios have.

5. Unarmed Vehicles
Any Unarmed Vehicle with no MMC Passengers is immediately Recalled.
Some people have already pointed this out. Its ahistorical and can destroy a game. Should be a standard rule.
It also speeds up the game with lesser pieces to care about!

6. Snap Shot
Snap Shots are NA across Walls/Hedges, nor across a Crest line that is Higher than the shooter.
This SSR's are based on actual events where players didn't agree, and this SSR settle this.
I have heard that the Snap Shots are currently being rewritten by MMP, since there are some holes in the rules.

7. Enemy AFV
D2.6 ENEMY AFV: A vehicle cannot voluntarily stop or end its MPh in Motion in an enemy AFV’s hex (whether Known or not) unless it can do so out of that AFV’s LOS (i.e., while Bypassing a hexside opposite that of the DEFENDER’s Bypass AFV), or unless it can, at the moment and position of entry into that hex, attack that AFV (regardless of its To Hit possibility) and be capable of destroying or shocking it with an Original TK or IFT DR of 5 (using a non-Depletable ammo type available to the vehicle). A vehicle thus barred from remaining in an AFV’s hex may not attempt ESB in that hex, and may check if VBM is allowed out of that hex prior to attempting VBM (2.3), if the vehicle still end its MPh in the hex it is immediately turned into a wreck as if eliminated in CC.
This alter the D2.6 rule so that you can't stop in an enemy AFV's location "involuntarily" with ESB (thus restricting an enemy AFV to fire out of his hex).
Based on actual events, destroying a good game with ahistorical game mechanics.

If one of the SSR's should be called "grudgy", this is the one. I can agree on that. ;) However, it still is a good rule.


Conclusion
I am happy that these things are discussed. If I have the time I may discuss this further, but only if the debate is respectful and friendly. Don't forget that we are all living in the same, tiny nerd basket.

These rules are meant to easen up the burden of the Round and Tournament Directors. As much as possible I want things to be clear. The fewer questions I get during a tournament, the better. The fewer questions the attendee have about the tournament after reading all information, the better.

I shuld also say that this is the first time that someone have questioned the SSR's since ever. I love input, either if it's bad or good, but somewhere there has to be rules (we just love rules, don't we? 😉 )

Roll low,
/Andreas Carlsson
 
Last edited:

Alessandro D.

Blind Sniper
Joined
Oct 22, 2015
Messages
111
Reaction score
88
Location
Foresto
Country
llItaly
This discussion has prompted me to think about modifying the CASLO tournament special rule regarding OBA, which is basically the Pleva OBA rule. The TSR states that players "must use it", but I can see changing the TSR to "may use it".
I don't think it is a good idea, you might end up spending more time in settling disputes that on more important stuff.
If both players agree to ignore it everything is fine anyway.

You can ask players feedback after the tournament to understand how many TD's SSR have been ignored and how often.

Anyhow I have much respect for TD that spent lot of time trying to run a tournament at their best (scenarios selection, administrative stuff, welcome players and so on) and if they think that some SSR will improve the overall game experience it is fine for me, I would never miss a tournament for that reason.
 

Michael Dorosh

der Spieß des Forums
Joined
Feb 6, 2004
Messages
15,747
Reaction score
2,796
Location
Calgary, AB
First name
Michael
Country
llCanada
F. Vehicle crew control of buildings - Many scenarios SSR this, exempting carriers which actually did dismount to fight as infantry.
This is specifically addressed by D6.82 which notes that British Carrier crews are represented by Infantry HS instead. A nice historical touch.

Not sure it was covered yet, but AFV crews of all nationalities, with the exception apparently of the Japanese, were expected to either stay with their vehicle on bailing out, or move to the rear since they were specialists and usually not equipped with anything more than pistols/SMGs for self defence.


Actual standing orders for Canadian tank crews at the link above. This is what the tank crews of 5th Canadian Armoured Division in Italy were told to do on bailing out:

Unless a tank is a complete brew-up or the tactical situation renders it impossible, the crew of an abandoned tank will remain in the vicinity in order to protect kit from the tank being looted. As soon as it is clear that the tank cannot be recovered under unit arrangements, the turret crew will report to the Regimental Aid Post or Officer Commanding A.1 Echelon as quickly as possible. The hull crews will remain with the tank until the kit is removed and the tank struck off unit charge, when they will report to Officer Commanding A.1 Echelon or to TD TP "G" Squadron 25 Canadian Armoured Delivery Regiment if the tank is evacuated to AWD.

Absolutely zero expectation that they continue fighting as infantry. And to drive the point home, the orders end with: "Failure to obey these orders will be treated as a court-martial charge."
 
Last edited:

Sparafucil3

Forum Guru
Joined
Oct 7, 2004
Messages
11,769
Reaction score
5,924
Location
USA
First name
Jim
Country
llUnited States
I never said the TD was objectively stupid. What I said was that the impetus for these objectively stupid rules was the influence of a few people who think that modifying the rules that led to some degree of embarrassment on their part (e.g., "losing the scenario") is the only way they can compensate for said embarrassment. I'm not calling those people stupid either; I do think that their particular viewpoints are unhelpful to the ASL community (and ASL as a game).

However, I have been advised that my comments go beyond the pale and risk causing some forum members to cry (or cry out in anger), and thus I no longer feel that I can contribute meaningfully to this thread (or likely any other). I'll crawl back into my shell and let you guys fight it out.
You can say many things about Steve Pleva (the Albany TD for many years). You can many things about Melvin Falk (the TD in Stockholm). Those two are some of the cerebral ASL players I know. They are also two of the best players I know. I doubt either of them has been surprised at the ASL table, let alone “embarrassed”. — jim
 

STAVKA

Elder Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2004
Messages
898
Reaction score
614
Location
East Front
Country
llFinland
This alter the D2.6 rule so that you can't stop in an enemy AFV's location "involuntarily" with ESB (thus restricting an enemy AFV to fire out of his hex).
Based on actual events, destroying a good game with ahistorical game mechanics.

If one of the SSR's should be called "grudgy", this is the one. I can agree on that. ;) However, it still is a good rule.
Must correct you why the Tournament rule is used, it is about VBM (not about ESB), the bold text have been added in the end of the original rule.

If an AFV enter an enemy AFVs hex and try to exit it via VBM and claim to spend all remaining MPs and fails with its VBM measurement then it will end its move in the same hex as the enemy AFV.

D2.6 ENEMY AFV: A vehicle cannot voluntarily stop or end its MPh in Motion in an enemy AFV ́s hex (whether Known or not) unless it can do so out of that AFV ́s LOS (i.e., while Bypassing a hexside opposite that of the DEFENDER ́s Bypass AFV), or unless it can, at the moment and position of entry into that hex, attack that AFV (regardless of its To Hit possibility) and be capable of destroying or shocking it with an Original TK or IFT DR of 5 (using a non-Depletable ammo type available to the vehicle). A vehicle thus barred from remaining in an AFV ́s hex may not attempt ESB in that hex, and may check if VBM is allowed out of that hex prior to attempting VBM (2.3), if the vehicle still end its MPh in the hex it is immediately turned into a wreck as if eliminated in CC.
 

STAVKA

Elder Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2004
Messages
898
Reaction score
614
Location
East Front
Country
llFinland
Monte Carlo Backgammon Championship 2024, 25 July - 4 Aug
A 10 Day - huge - event, many different types of Backgammon in play from Classic to Speedgammon. Big money involved, an event going strong since 1967.
Male competition: winner from Sweden 2024
Female competition: winner from Nippon 2024

If you want to read a serious set of lengthy tournament rules look no further. https://www.backgammonworldchampionship.com/


3.3 The dice
  • 1.
    IN GENERAL. If they are available, a player can demand that precision dice are used in preference to other dice. If precision dice are only available after the match is started, the player can demand that the dice are replaced at that time.
  • 2.
    IN MATCHES PLAYED WITHOUT THE USE OF A GAME CLOCK. The players must select four dice. These must be used for the entire match, except for situations as described in § 3.3, subsection 1 and § 3.7, subsection 1. Each player must use two dice.
  • 3.
    IN MATCHES PLAYED WITH THE USE OF A GAME CLOCK. The players must select four dice. These must be used for the entire match, except for situations as described in § 3.3, subsection 1 and § 3.7, subsection 1. Only two dice are in use in each game. Four dice must be present at the board though, so that a change of dice is possible.
 

MajorDomo

DM? Chuck H2O in his face
Joined
Sep 1, 2003
Messages
3,227
Reaction score
1,121
Location
Fluid
Country
llUnited States
My interpretation was that most crews survived the "loss" of an AFV that was no longer effective on the battlefield. Even when a vehicle is turned into a burning wreck it was likely the policy of "keep firing until it burns" rather than a catastrophic first round kill. This doesn't mean you had complete five man crews running around on the battlefield creating mischief, but rather there would be a few guys carrying one or two wounded guys off the battlefield after the loss of their AFV. There are all sorts of numbers floating around but being a WW2 tank crew in the US Army in Europe was a reasonably safe career choice compared to the PBI. I therefore expect Japanese crews to be more "mischievious".
I received the LFT pack (with the cool MMP map redraws) and choice of a book.

Certainly that is enough to light fire to my village, if it had been allowed!

Rich
 

PresterJohn

Elder Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2022
Messages
1,302
Reaction score
780
Location
The Orient
Country
llAustralia
Monte Carlo Backgammon Championship 2024, 25 July - 4 Aug
A 10 Day - huge - event, many different types of Backgammon in play from Classic to Speedgammon. Big money involved, an event going strong since 1967.
Male competition: winner from Sweden 2024
Female competition: winner from Nippon 2024

If you want to read a serious set of lengthy tournament rules look no further. https://www.backgammonworldchampionship.com/


3.3 The dice
  • 1.
    IN GENERAL. If they are available, a player can demand that precision dice are used in preference to other dice. If precision dice are only available after the match is started, the player can demand that the dice are replaced at that time.
  • 2.
    IN MATCHES PLAYED WITHOUT THE USE OF A GAME CLOCK. The players must select four dice. These must be used for the entire match, except for situations as described in § 3.3, subsection 1 and § 3.7, subsection 1. Each player must use two dice.
  • 3.
    IN MATCHES PLAYED WITH THE USE OF A GAME CLOCK. The players must select four dice. These must be used for the entire match, except for situations as described in § 3.3, subsection 1 and § 3.7, subsection 1. Only two dice are in use in each game. Four dice must be present at the board though, so that a change of dice is possible.
And they have a choice of dice cup or "baffle box".
 

Michael Dorosh

der Spieß des Forums
Joined
Feb 6, 2004
Messages
15,747
Reaction score
2,796
Location
Calgary, AB
First name
Michael
Country
llCanada
[QUOTE
I'm shocked that Hasbro hasn't leveraged their product's innovative dice rolling mechanism ("Pop-O-Matic") that many of us fondly remember from our childhood days into their MMP offerings.

View attachment 30229
If a glass cup is honestly considered too loud for a tournament as we saw upthread, you can guarantee Pop-a-Matic dice would be too. The only sensible thing to do, honestly, would be to draw chits instead of roll dice.
 
Top