Perry
Forum Guru
Does the 37L firing a Steilgranate 41 get multiple hits?
Never.
Oh, never?
Welllll, never.
German 37L AT gun
- Thread starter Paul John
- Start date
Never.
Oh, never?
Welllll, never.
semenza
Senior Member
That doesn't even make sense. Although maybe you meant to say the opposite? There is no implication. Multiple Hits and more than one TK are not the same thing. I don't even think there is a German 37L that gets more than one TK. And even if there is , it would not get Multiple Hits when firing a Stielgranate 41!
Seth
Last edited:
STAVKA
Elder Member
Even Perry realized he made a bad call to your bad question, so he had to change the answer to support your bad wording but still no rule reference to support his position.
STAVKA
Elder Member
You make no sense.
STAVKA
Elder Member
This makes sense, do you see the difference?
jrv
Forum Guru
Perry's answers are not like your or my answers. You and I have to provide a rule number to support an answer. We cannot create errata. Perry can create errata.
JR
STAVKA
Elder Member
semenza
Senior Member
The rules I will site are probably the same as the rules you site. C3.31, C3.8, and the German Chapter H Ordnance note B, Chapter C footnote #8. Probably could throw a few more in depending on the direction of debate but they are not needed.
The only thing clear is that it is not 100% clear. Which is why there are people on both sides in this topic. Which is why the question was sent to Perry. Perry provided an answer. Perry's answer is sensible in light of the attributes of the weapon in question and the intent and reason behind the multiple hits rule. To allow the Stielgranate to have multiple hits is ridiculous.
Seth
The only thing clear is that it is not 100% clear. Which is why there are people on both sides in this topic. Which is why the question was sent to Perry. Perry provided an answer. Perry's answer is sensible in light of the attributes of the weapon in question and the intent and reason behind the multiple hits rule. To allow the Stielgranate to have multiple hits is ridiculous.
Seth
Ric of The LBC
Elder Member
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2017
- Messages
- 1,893
- Reaction score
- 1,852
- Location
- Peoples Republic of California
- Country
-
What is the answer to this: Does the 37L firing a Steilgranate 41 get only one hit?
STAVKA
Elder Member
I stated early on, the rule is silly and not on line with common sense.
But somehow you twisted it all to be that your holy rule text is in fact logic and not silly at all, and even called upon your holy Bus driver to help you out to make a meaning out of nothing.
STAVKA
Elder Member
..or two, but always two Perry sez (chose one).
semenza
Senior Member
Perry's answer both in this topic and to the question I sent (which is posted on the Perry sez board) is that the Stielgrante 41 does NOT get Multiple Hits.
Seth
von Marwitz
Forum Guru
As by the 'Perry Sez' it does not get Multiple Hits as per C3.8.
Multiple Hits would grant you two TK rolls of which you may select one (usually the one with the better result) after you rolled doubles on the one TH roll.
von Marwitz
Ric of The LBC
Elder Member
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2017
- Messages
- 1,893
- Reaction score
- 1,852
- Location
- Peoples Republic of California
- Country
-
i was being facetious
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2003
- Messages
- 19,636
- Reaction score
- 5,613
- Location
- St-Légier
- First name
- Robin
- Country
-
At least trolls get multiple hits in this thread.:highfive:i was being facetious
Ric of The LBC
Elder Member
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2017
- Messages
- 1,893
- Reaction score
- 1,852
- Location
- Peoples Republic of California
- Country
-
:bow:
semenza
Senior Member
BattleSchool
Elder Member
bprobst
Elder Member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2003
- Messages
- 2,535
- Reaction score
- 1,441
- Location
- Melbourne, Australia
- First name
- Bruce
- Country
-
Presumably there will be official errata on this in due course. So that it's, you know, official.
Philippe D.
Elder Member
That's the problem with working with "Perry sez" collections: Perry's answers include both "here's what the rules say" answers, and "the rules are not 100% clear/foolproof, here's a ruling". But when not officially turned into errata, the latter have no effect on the rules themselves, and I can understand that some people insist on playing by the rules as written (and as amended by errata, of course).
Currently, MMP still issue errata from the 20th century: by printing them in the ASL Journal. I for one would not be sorry to see them move to a format where they released them somewhat faster, by posting them to their website or whatever. And, why not, make "Perry sez" into an official source of errata (which is a different thing: an erratum requires specific wording to change the rules - Perry's answers are typically way shorter than that).
Currently, MMP still issue errata from the 20th century: by printing them in the ASL Journal. I for one would not be sorry to see them move to a format where they released them somewhat faster, by posting them to their website or whatever. And, why not, make "Perry sez" into an official source of errata (which is a different thing: an erratum requires specific wording to change the rules - Perry's answers are typically way shorter than that).