When I played this scenario, my opponent rode his motorcycles through residual of my two HS in the F6 three buildings. He VBM'd the HS but I got residual down just before. The residual rolled well and there were broken, reduced HS aplenty.Pretty gutsy of those motorcyclists going through that residual, but judging from the bottle-necked terrain, didn't look like they had much of a choice; especially if time was of such consideration that they could not simply wait a turn. Hell, if I know there is hail up ahead I'll pull under an overpass. Bullets? No thanks!
Vehicular MA MGs can make TK attempts during the MPh and AFPh as far as I know. Klas?Great ARR. I think the German should learn the rule about LMGs not killing tanks when their firepower is halved, eg. Advancing fire. I think that even applies to a AFVs mg main armament. It's a good rule to know.
Ah!! A9.61 ....Such an attack must be made within Normal Range of the MG, without any form of halved FP penalty imposed, and predesignated as an AFV To Kill attack vs a specific AFVGreat ARR. I think the German should learn the rule about LMGs not killing tanks when their firepower is halved, eg. Advancing fire. I think that even applies to a AFVs mg main armament. It's a good rule to know.
It is legal as per D3.53 and reinforced by this Q&A:When we play tested the Polish module tanks Main mgs couldn't AFV kill when halved.
Thanks for the clarification and good, because it's more fun to allow AFV MG attack bounding fire !It is legal as per D3.53 and reinforced by this Q&A:
"D3.3 & D3.53 Can a vehicular MG that is the vehicle’s MA, fire a “AFV To Kill DR” as Bounding First Fire? If so, why does the portion of A9.61 that says “Such an attack must be made...without any form of halved FP penalty imposed...” not apply? A. Yes, just as it can in AFPh. Because of D3.53."
Cheers,
Steve