KG_Jag
KG Vice Kommandir
It rhymes with the "Fritz". Geordie can be more specific if it is OK to do so.My bad. What site are you talking about then?
It rhymes with the "Fritz". Geordie can be more specific if it is OK to do so.My bad. What site are you talking about then?
Yeah. I understand they are talking about a different site (the Fritz comment clue didn't help but I'll think on it a spell). But you may not have read my post above. I'll repost it for clarification:Elvis
Once again, for an example of some of the issues at BFC, you can go back and look at a conversation here that you participated in. I linked a specific incident where I was threatened with a ban for calling out that a beta tester had made an uncalled for remark to someone asking a pretty simple question. You were involved in the discussion of that specific incident.
I don't understand why you come back every few months and almost act like you were never here or participated in any discussions.
btw, I am pretty sure they are talking about a non-BFC website.
Doesn't really mesh with the "act like you were never here or participated in any discussions", does it? I will attribute that to maybe not having read my post.I am familiar with the posts regarding the "double standard" that have gone on here. I was specificlly looking for an example of someone banned for expressing their ideas rather their behavior.
Red dog, baby.(the Fritz comment clue didn't help but I'll think on it a spell).
MR, I will work on this overnight. Part of the puzzle is trying to think of what site is so powerful to have an almost Voldemort hold on some posters here.You know what happened in Europe in 1939 Elvis? The Blitzkrieg.
Now match the rhymes.
Good Hunting.
MR
What is the definition of "here"Yeah. I understand they are talking about a different site (the Fritz comment clue didn't help but I'll think on it a spell). But you may not have read my post above. I'll repost it for clarification:
Doesn't really mesh with the "act like you were never here or participated in any discussions", does it? I will attribute that to maybe not having read my post.
Oh no - note what I said:Mmm, banning someone from one site for what they said on another. Have we run across that one before--Geordie, Leto and friends?
I suspect that BF knows that such a move is not only wrong, but would not just burn bridges--it would also dynamite them with a large part of the wargaming community, far beyond those who might be banned.
If I stayed neutral I'd probably be fine, and if I drank the New Way Forward kool-aid I'd be welcomed. But I'd do neither and the combination, and I'd be half of that combination, would get me the hook.Their New Way Forward plus my personality
I like that, the site which shall not be named! It was a while back, but a site that suffered from a few forceful personalities, unfortunately they were the Mods. When a bunch of guys moved their discussion to another site, they were followed and banned for their comments on the new site.MR, I will work on this overnight. Part of the puzzle is trying to think of what site is so powerful to have an almost Voldemort hold on some posters here.
What I don't understand is why the site in question is so carefully not being named. Is there still someone left for them to ban if they find out they're being discussed here?I like that, the site which shall not be named! It was a while back, but a site that suffered from a few forceful personalities, unfortunately they were the Mods. When a bunch of guys moved their discussion to another site, they were followed and banned for their comments on the new site.
They also had their complete gaming records expunged in a Stalinesqe purge so that today you would never know they had existed. The world of CM is populated by some very petty people.
Probably just an effort avoid forum wars.What I don't understand is why the site in question is so carefully not being named. Is there still someone left for them to ban if they find out they're being discussed here?
John
Quote Originally Posted by Elvis View Post
Yeah. I understand they are talking about a different site (the Fritz comment clue didn't help but I'll think on it a spell). But you may not have read my post above. I'll repost it for clarification:
Doesn't really mesh with the "act like you were never here or participated in any discussions", does it? I will attribute that to maybe not having read my post.
I was quoting you. I would think you would have a better idea than me. When I read your comment to me I assumed by "here" you meant this forum.What is the definition of "here"
Thanks. I don't think I've ever visted the site...Might be interesting.The Blitzkrieg war gaming club, CM message board.
Someone had to say it! :bite:
Bugger all happens there these days :OHNO:
Why is it when I am asked a direct question I answer it but when I ask some folks they don't?Regardless Elvis, my conviction stands that you participate in discussions, drop off for a while, then come back looking for the same proof you asked for initially. I just want to understand why.
I will try searching people banned from BFC forum and see what it gives me. However I have had no luck in the past with the search engine on this forum. As I may have said ealier I still can't find a single post by Mustang 2.0. That is something that should be simple right? No dice.You asked that question at least a year ago and at that time I went dug out the thread. What I am saying is the search button works for everyone.
I most often do not. My point was simply I am not the only retreader. Perhaps when some other folks retread you may want to admonish them for it as well.As far as retreading threads goes, feel free to not participate in them.
I can be counted as a member of the diaspora.A bunch of long threads (some 45 pages long) long came up. No interest to seach through them to find som mention of Adam or MDs expulsions. I'll hang on that someone knows a name or 2 off the top of their head.
You got banned? I had no idea. What was your crime?I can be counted as a member of the diaspora.