Oberst Hausser
Member
7.221 FPF NON-CC REACTION FIRE: Each DEFENDER Personnel unit [EXC: Infantry manning a Gun marked as given in 7.23] eligible to use Non-CC Reaction Fire, and marked by a Final Fire counter when OVR by other than an unarmored vehicle with no PRC, must use (as per 7.22) TPBF, an ordnance SW, a FT or a Thrown DC vs that vehicle [EXC: if pinned, it cannot use FT or DC (A7.81); if otherwise allowed, it may use CC Reaction Fire (7.212) instead]. Each FPF Reaction fire TH, TPBF/FT/IFT, or DC Position, DR also acts as a NMC DR vs the attacking DEFENDER(S) as per A8.3] (as per C5.64 for ordnance).
7.212 FPF CC REACTION FIRE: Each DEFENDER unit (even if pinned) otherwise eligible to use CC Reaction Fire, and marked with a Final Fire counter when OVR by other than an unarmored vehicle with no PRC, must attempt (as per 7.21) such a CC attack vs that vehicle [EXC: if otherwise allowed, it may use FPF Non-CC Reaction Fire (7.221) instead]. Vs an AFV, that DEFENDER may first be subject to a PAATC (see 7.21). Being currently pinned (for any reason) does not cancel its required FPF CC Reaction Fire attack. Each FPF CC Reaction Fire attack DR also acts as a NMC DR vs the attacking DEFENDER(S) as per A8.31. For DEFENDER Infantry manning a Gun, see also 7.23.
Sorry for the lot of text but ...
In "FPF NON-CC REACTION FIRE" what counts as an ordinance SW?
A 50/60mm mtr ?, Bazooka ? . If either do they Intensive Fire?
Second, since being pinned during FPF has probably used up all SW one has to use CC RF with the
detriment of " Each FPF CC Reaction Fire attack DR also acts as a NMC DR vs the attacking DEFENDER"
In a built up area this would require an non OT AFV ( to enter stone terrain) but a NMC on a near dead ( 3 CC DR) might just be worth it. Given the above amount of effort it may be eliminated for failure to rout etc. In any event bazooka can't be used in melee...
7.212 FPF CC REACTION FIRE: Each DEFENDER unit (even if pinned) otherwise eligible to use CC Reaction Fire, and marked with a Final Fire counter when OVR by other than an unarmored vehicle with no PRC, must attempt (as per 7.21) such a CC attack vs that vehicle [EXC: if otherwise allowed, it may use FPF Non-CC Reaction Fire (7.221) instead]. Vs an AFV, that DEFENDER may first be subject to a PAATC (see 7.21). Being currently pinned (for any reason) does not cancel its required FPF CC Reaction Fire attack. Each FPF CC Reaction Fire attack DR also acts as a NMC DR vs the attacking DEFENDER(S) as per A8.31. For DEFENDER Infantry manning a Gun, see also 7.23.
Sorry for the lot of text but ...
In "FPF NON-CC REACTION FIRE" what counts as an ordinance SW?
A 50/60mm mtr ?, Bazooka ? . If either do they Intensive Fire?
Second, since being pinned during FPF has probably used up all SW one has to use CC RF with the
detriment of " Each FPF CC Reaction Fire attack DR also acts as a NMC DR vs the attacking DEFENDER"
In a built up area this would require an non OT AFV ( to enter stone terrain) but a NMC on a near dead ( 3 CC DR) might just be worth it. Given the above amount of effort it may be eliminated for failure to rout etc. In any event bazooka can't be used in melee...