macrobo
King of Boxcars
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2005
- Messages
- 1,266
- Reaction score
- 623
- Location
- Geelong Melbourne
- First name
- Rob
- Country
HI All
I always thought that the infantry flamethrower and vehicle were the same - so drive up to the enemy - blaze away with limited modifiers and drive off (people with wasps have done this too me so many times!)
but
My esteemed opponent Duncan quoted a +4 for such an attack by ASLRB section
3.6 FT: Vehicular-mounted FT are often more powerful than the Infantry SW variety
of A22 and may have more FP, range, and different X# as depicted on the counter, but
otherwise work the same [EXC: Motion Fire; 2.42]. Case A To Hit DRM apply as
IFT DRM unless using Bounding First Fire (C5.13).
Which establishes that DRM are applied to the IFT roll for Case A
Then there's Cases B&C:
We also now question whther BU also adds another +1?
Can someone affirm that is the intention of the rule (which thus I have played wrong with even people I consider rules guru's)
and tell me if BU also applies
cheers
Rob
I always thought that the infantry flamethrower and vehicle were the same - so drive up to the enemy - blaze away with limited modifiers and drive off (people with wasps have done this too me so many times!)
but
My esteemed opponent Duncan quoted a +4 for such an attack by ASLRB section
3.6 FT: Vehicular-mounted FT are often more powerful than the Infantry SW variety
of A22 and may have more FP, range, and different X# as depicted on the counter, but
otherwise work the same [EXC: Motion Fire; 2.42]. Case A To Hit DRM apply as
IFT DRM unless using Bounding First Fire (C5.13).
Which establishes that DRM are applied to the IFT roll for Case A
Then there's Cases B&C:
We also now question whther BU also adds another +1?
Can someone affirm that is the intention of the rule (which thus I have played wrong with even people I consider rules guru's)
and tell me if BU also applies
cheers
Rob