Elvis
Member
I guess the answer is, correct. It is not cool to reuse them within a family. WHich is why I referred to MG and CW as extreme cases. We will probably never see that again. But, for instance, leaving some German formations out of the Eastern front because they were in Normandy is not going to happen. I don't think it is a new party line....I think it is the old one.So it's OK to reuse formations and weapons from game to game but not within families? Is this the new party-line? Or can 'packs' trump this law under a 'rock-paper-scissors-packs' over-ride-clause?
Announcements will be made as things get closer. But yes, major feature changes, like we saw with 2.0, will be the domain of families.Are 'Features' still the domain of a 'Family-Starter'? Has there been anything like an announcement regarding what features will be in? Fire? Tank-Riders? Mine-Rollers? Spam?
All announcements will be made well into development. The point where it is too late to add anything major and not likely to be removed. That has been the program since before shock force. That said, tweaking these things always happens after feedback...usually after release. Otherwise there would be a cacophony of voices and nothing would ever get done (see the CMBO beta demo for reference).As great as it is to watch a cheezy video (of tank riders, not that MD wierdness with the antitank gun), I would just prefer a open discussion of what will be in. This might start meaningful discussions before the 'finished' product is unleashed a gullible and starving wargaming community.