Dragons Teeth
- Thread starter 21Z5M
- Start date
von Marwitz
Forum Guru
No. If so then only per SSR by a TPP or for a particular scenario. Nor do I think it would make particular sense.
In the time scope of a scenario, it would not normally be possible to have them removed or covered by dirt and rubble to clear a path for tanks and vehicles. At the same time, they are no hindrance for movement of infantry.
To reflect them in game terms, I believe an AT-Ditch serves the purpose pretty well.
von Marwitz
If they are big enough they might even provide some cover to infantry, at least enough to negate any FFMO DRM. ASL level demolition would be hard, most photos I have seen have 4+ layers. An AVRE might be able to blast it's way through, though that would take the whole of a scenario to do.
Danno
Ost Front Fanatic
I recommend you treat them as Crag. Serves the cover purpose for infantry and cannot be entered by tanks.
Last edited:
Yes, I thought there was a footnote saying that, but do not see it now.
Vinnie
See Dummies in the index
I'd just treat them as an AT ditch. Infantry can go straight through or crouch (spend 1 mf to enter ) and get cover.
Tom Morin
Senior Member
IMO, graveyards work better. They resemble dragon's teeth only 'thicker'. They provide a Hindrance (whereas none for A-T ditch), and +1 TEM (as opposed to the +2 of ditch, which seems excessive for dragon's teeth). Entry should only be 1 MF (easy to enter like graveyard), not the +2MF to enter/exit a an A-T ditch. You would have to forbid entry by vehicles (which is allowed in Graveyard with hefty Bog DRM).
Tom
Tom
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2003
- Messages
- 19,635
- Reaction score
- 5,612
- Location
- St-Légier
- First name
- Robin
- Country
-
With a licence to kill?
Of all the suggestions, I have really warmed to the "Graveyard" solution with Crags as a second choice.