von Marwitz
Forum Guru
Whatever. I enjoyed playing both scenarios.Even worse than Gavin Take is Shklovs Labors Lost. Two 10-3 dueling with each other for battlefield supremacy.
von Marwitz
Whatever. I enjoyed playing both scenarios.Even worse than Gavin Take is Shklovs Labors Lost. Two 10-3 dueling with each other for battlefield supremacy.
There's a disproportionate amount of scenarios with Tigers in them! I try and avoid them too!...well I think 10-3s are more unbalancing to a scenario - you can always swarm a Tiger after all.Refusing to have a 10-3 leader in a scenario because it is overpowered is like shunning a scenario because it has a Tiger in it.
All is in the VC and other design choices, such as the overall leadership quality (and the number of leaders).
Also, a player is very tempted to use his 10-3 daringly, thus reducing its survival probability. And even if he is careful, there are dangerous moves that one will make with less powerful leaders, which will put a 10-3 in harm's way (with a potentially bad outcome for it too).
This is one of the many reasons why I enjoy playing the DTO scenarios so much.I have my "end war heavy metal" moments, but I think that I prefer tin cans or average tanks over super heavyweights most of the time.