D3.7 MA disabled Recall effects

[Robin Reeve]

Hi all,

D3.7 says : "Any vehicle whose MA and all Secondary Armament (if any, as per Vehicle Listing) are all disabled is immediately Recalled (5.341) unless that vehicle has Passenger/Towing capability. "

Does this Recall status include the "+1" DRM that is the effect of a STUN result?
I don't think so, but the reference to D5.341 is given without any mention of the DRM not applying (even though D5.341 links it to the stun result).

 

[Mister T]

Look at the Recall counter. A +1 is visible.

 

[Robin Reeve]

But that counter indicates the +1 for the stun/STUN effect.
There is no counter for the disabled MA Recall.

 

[Philippe D.]

I think (might be wrong of course) that there is only one "Recall" counter type, and only one "Recall" status.

 

[zgrose]

I think (might be wrong of course) that there is only one "Recall" counter type, and only one "Recall" status.

I've always assumed the MA Disabled counter was essentially the "Recalled" counter. Doesn't make sense to have a +1 DRM from having been previously Stunned.

 

[Eagle4ty]

It doesn't say to put a RECALL counter on the vehicle, simply that it is RECALLED. Therefore the additional +1 RECALL incurred for a Fire/casualty inflicted RECALL does not apply. As "zgrose" has stated the MA/SA Disabled counter is enough to let you know the vehicle s RECALLED but under no further restrictions.

 

[Robin Reeve]

Klas' Perry Sez Q&A:

D5.341
Does a Vehicle Recalled due to its MA being Disabled suffer the +1 TH/MC/TC/IFT/CC penalty of D5.341?
A. No. {4}

A French forum member found it.

 

[Nearmiss]

Forum Legion....?

 

[Robin Reeve]

Forum Legion....?

Huh?

 

[klasmalmstrom]

Huh?

Instead of "Foreign Legion"

 

[Gordon]

That was just a Beau Jest.

 

[Robin Reeve]

I see.
Nice pun. ?

 

[von Marwitz]

That was just a Beau Jest.

I see.
Nice pun. ?

Had it been Indian, it could have been a nice Punjabi.
Just for the those understanding German: This was a Mar-Witz.

von Marwitz