Critical Hit Question

[Hemaelstrom]

The problem with the DaE rules is that there is no longer any indication of how to resolve a ATT/FFE CH against an armoured target, at least that I can find. ASLSK#3 introduced double FP on IFT with no TEM for such cases, consistent with C3.72 from full ASL, though not worded perfectly, but that seems to have been deleted from the new SK6.1. Sorry for my late reply to this thread – I haven’t had DaE for very long.

 

[jrv]

The problem with the DaE rules is that there is no longer any indication of how to resolve a ATT/FFE CH against an armoured target, at least that I can find. ASLSK#3 introduced double FP on IFT with no TEM for such cases, consistent with C3.72 from full ASL, though not worded perfectly, but that seems to have been deleted from the new SK6.1. Sorry for my late reply to this thread – I haven’t had DaE for very long.

Yes, it looks as though a sentence was deleted from 6.1 in DaE. The sentence is present in ASLSK EP#1 (and from what you say in ASLSK#3).

JR

 

[TheSQLGuru]

I checked MMP's website (http://www.multimanpublishing.com/tabid/59/ProductID/258/Default.aspx) and there are errata there for DaE, but not this one. I sent Perry an email inquiring.