- Joined
- Jul 26, 2003
- Messages
- 19,646
- Reaction score
- 5,630
- Location
- St-Légier
- First name
- Robin
- Country
Is a unit in Crest status ADJACENT to a unit adjacent to the Depression in a non Depression hex which is not part of the front hexes of the in Crest unit?
B20.91 says that "Infantry in Crest status are considered entrenched one level higher than the Depression against all Direct fire attacks across any of the front three hexsides of that Depression hex (as identified by placement of the Crest counter) which are not crossed by a Depression hexside ".
Does the fact that an entrenched unit is not in a different Location in its hex (B27.13) allow the idea that a unit in an adjacent hex, having LOS to it, not able to advance directly to its Crest position, but otherwise able to Advance IN the Depression hex, is still ADJACENT to it?
I am referring to the definition of ADJACENT of the Index: "(Locations [and units in them] are considered ADJACENT if any Infantry unit in one Location could conceivably—ignoring any enemy presence—advance into the other during the APh and a LOS exists between the two Locations)."
To illustrate my question here is a picture from a current playing of SP267 Death's Head Debut :
Is the 548 in 59L7 ADJACENT to the 548 in 59L8 (and thus allowed to form a FG with it) ?
I am sure that the 548 in 59M7 is ADJACENT to 59L7, though.
Thanks in advance for the answers.
B20.91 says that "Infantry in Crest status are considered entrenched one level higher than the Depression against all Direct fire attacks across any of the front three hexsides of that Depression hex (as identified by placement of the Crest counter) which are not crossed by a Depression hexside ".
Does the fact that an entrenched unit is not in a different Location in its hex (B27.13) allow the idea that a unit in an adjacent hex, having LOS to it, not able to advance directly to its Crest position, but otherwise able to Advance IN the Depression hex, is still ADJACENT to it?
I am referring to the definition of ADJACENT of the Index: "(Locations [and units in them] are considered ADJACENT if any Infantry unit in one Location could conceivably—ignoring any enemy presence—advance into the other during the APh and a LOS exists between the two Locations)."
To illustrate my question here is a picture from a current playing of SP267 Death's Head Debut :
Is the 548 in 59L7 ADJACENT to the 548 in 59L8 (and thus allowed to form a FG with it) ?
I am sure that the 548 in 59M7 is ADJACENT to 59L7, though.
Thanks in advance for the answers.
Last edited: