You're correct. In fact, federal law is 18, some states are 18 or 19 also. Looks like someone pulled facts out of their ass again.
http://smartgunlaws.org/gun-laws/policy-areas/consumer-child-safety/minimum-age/
Good summary of the state and federal laws further down that page.
what exactly did you miss on the first paragraph here Michael?
http://smartgunlaws.org/minimum-age-to-purchase-possess-in-california/
Your website, but they all pretty much say the same thing:
"Minimum age for sales and transfers: California prohibits any person, corporation or firm from selling a handgun to anyone under age 21,
..."
I understand that it can be difficult for certain people to read the first sentence in a paragraph.
care for a different State , perhaps?
http://smartgunlaws.org/minimum-age-to-purchase-or-possess-firearms-in-new-york/
"New York law prohibits anyone under age 21 from obtaining a license to possess or carry a handgun..."
Again, a bit difficult to understand when one must read the first sentence of a paragraph first.
The really sad part about "bogus facts":
Your own link:
http://smartgunlaws.org/gun-laws/policy-areas/consumer-child-safety/minimum-age/
Did you miss this part?
"...Dealers may not sell or deliver a handgun or ammunition for a handgun to any person the dealer has reasonable cause to believe is under age 21." (18 U.S.C. § 922(b)(1), (c)(1).)
The worst part about assumptions is they tend to make an a$$ of oneself. Perhaps you might consider reading the material before you reference it? Federal law prohibits selling a handgun to a person believed to be under the age of 21. That is pretty clear in the U.S. Code. Some states, but not all ban their possession under the age of 21 as well. If you'd like to continue this discussion I would be more than happy to oblige, off this thread - no reason to continue hijacking it IMO.
None of the above having one whit to do with the fact that if you, or anyone else, were to commit a hate crime in any State of the United States, and used, displayed, or left Nazi symbolism during the commission of that crime or as evidence afterward - the perpetrator(s) would find their use of Nazi symbolism is in fact - banned, unlawful, and opens up prosecution options including "special circumstances" in almost every case. (Not to mention it typically becomes a penultimate form of evidence that it was a hate crime, and not any other type of crime in the first place.) Which remains the point of the post itself that I made. One might desire the Death's Head on the counter, but the use of the symbol is not
automatically allowed - period; just because one lives in the United States. NSWPP v Skokie, IL did not set a case precedent.