CC refresher - do we need it ? ( ohh yes )

Oberst Balck

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Messages
855
Reaction score
2
Location
Australia
Country
llAustralia
Situations…

FIRING IN TPB SITUATIONS AND CC

A bezerk unit charges to a enemy unit with the fewest MP possible the enemy (a 467) fires with DFF ( 8 – 2 we’ll say). The bezerk unit then ENTERS the hex. The 467 fires with DF ( 4 * 3/ 2 = 6 FP + TEM). Now presume both units are ok.

1) In the AFPh can the bezerk unit fire at 3/2* FP ?

In situation 2

The defender does not attack and remains concealed. The bezerk units attacks in the CC with ½ FP value. The 467 is unscathed.

1) In the Prep Fire Phase can the 467 attack a TPBF ? If yes can the bezerk unit fire at TPBF in the DFPh ?

In either of the above cases when are units UNABLE to use either of the above methods?



Thanks
 

Robin Reeve

The Swiss Moron
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jul 26, 2003
Messages
19,644
Reaction score
5,625
Location
St-Légier
First name
Robin
Country
llSwitzerland
I'd say "yes" to all.
In second case, as Melee does not yet exist after 467 fired, Berserk can fire before CCPh.
In second case, Berserk could not TPB fire in DFPh if eliminated by 467 (e.g. rolling boxcars when testing morale, or by other means)...
But I believe you would like to have other answers about units not able to use the methods you propose...
 

Anonymous

Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2004
Messages
897
Reaction score
6
Country
llUnited States
Situation 1: Yes, the berserk unit can fire during the AFPh.

Situation 2: The berserk unit must Charge a Known enemy unit; if there were no Known enemy units at the time of suffering the berserk result, it would have Battle Hardened instead.

If, on the way to Charging a Known enemy unit, it entered a "?" unit's Location, it couldn't stop, it would have to keep Charging toward a Known enemy unit. And since the berserk unit must use Bypass if possible, I think it is highly unlikely that it would end the MPh in a Location containing a "?" enemy unit.

Having said that, in the unlikely event that it does happen as you describe, then the 4-6-7 could fire in the PFPh, and the berserker could fire back in the DFPh, since a Melee has not yet occurred.

As regards your final question, I believe that what you propose is valid, so I cannot think offhand of a case where they would be unable to fire as you suggest.

Regards,
Bruce
 

Treadhead

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2003
Messages
3,140
Reaction score
216
Location
Michigan
Country
llUnited States
(Sorry folks, that "Guest" reply was mine... I thought I was logged in, but evidently not. Am still getting used to this interface.)

Bruce Bakken
 

Brian W

Elder Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2003
Messages
7,216
Reaction score
1,027
Location
USA
Country
llUnited States
Oberst Balck said:
A bezerk unit charges to a enemy unit with the fewest MP possible the enemy (a 467) fires with DFF ( 8 – 2 we’ll say). The bezerk unit then ENTERS the hex. The 467 fires with DF ( 4 * 3/ 2 = 6 FP + TEM). Now presume both units are ok.

1) In the AFPh can the bezerk unit fire at 3/2* FP ?
Yes

Oberst Balck said:
The defender does not attack and remains concealed. The bezerk units attacks in the CC with ½ FP value. The 467 is unscathed.
First, the defender must lose concealment per Case A of the Concealment Loss/Gain Chart unless the beserk unit were bypassing the hex. Also, any armed and unbroken Infantry unit must fire at an enemy infantry/cavalry unit that enters its location during the MPh [exc: bypass] per A8.312.

Oberst Balck said:
1) In the Prep Fire Phase can the 467 attack a TPBF ? If yes can the bezerk unit fire at TPBF in the DFPh ?
Although this situation could not happen, it is possible to start a PFPh with units in the same location, some in Melee and some in CC; in that case the answer is yes.
Oberst Balck said:
If yes can the bezerk unit fire at TPBF in the DFPh ?
No (i.e. the berserk unit would still be held in melee).
 

Oberst Balck

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Messages
855
Reaction score
2
Location
Australia
Country
llAustralia
thanks . more comments welcome

Thanks for all your comments and clarrifications.. :D

I will need to relook at the bezerk rules as I see my ? situaution would not occur with them ( ie: ? are not a target).

Any other brainwaves out there keep 'em coming.. :arrow:


Thanks again
 

Treadhead

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2003
Messages
3,140
Reaction score
216
Location
Michigan
Country
llUnited States
(Not sure how to use quotes... but Brian W. said:)

First, the defender must lose concealment per Case A of the Concealment Loss/Gain Chart unless the beserk unit were bypassing the hex. Also, any armed and unbroken Infantry unit must fire at an enemy infantry/cavalry unit that enters its location during the MPh [exc: bypass] per A8.312.
Anyway, good catch. I was incorrect regarding the berserk unit entering the "?" unit's Location. If the berserk unit enters the Location, then the "?" unit must use TPBF per A8.312 as you point out.

However, even if an enemy unit enters a "?" unit's Location via Bypass, the "?" unit must still fire at it per A8.312. I.e., there is no exception for bypass in this instance. (Which still makes me wrong.)

Regards,
Bruce B.
 

Oberst Balck

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Messages
855
Reaction score
2
Location
Australia
Country
llAustralia
bezerk and CC

It should be noted ( A15.431)

" If it moves into a ? enemies hex while charging another unit it must remain in that hex and attampt to elinminate all enemy therin instead."

I presume or infer that this would happen when when rubble or other unbypassable terrain ( adjoining woods) make this occur. I am not sure if the bezerk unit can elect to go to the hex that is NOT occupied by a ? enemy ( two parallel adjacent hexes), say when having initially viewed a unit in a level 2 building..

Anyway, the bezerk thing with a ? enemy CAN happen, just a bit of an unusual event.
 
Top