semenza
Senior Member
If I already have PiF does this sheet add any new types of Polish infantry?
Seth
Seth
No, it just adds some of the counters needed for PiF scenarios. However, it does add Fanatic versions of the infantry.If I already have PiF does this sheet add any new types of Polish infantry?
Seth
I miss him too. The quality and frequency of historical content and commentary on this site has been greatly diminished following his passing.
Same for me. I miss him any time I enter this forum.I miss him too. The quality and frequency of historical content and commentary on this site has been greatly diminished following his passing.
Only two prototypes built. Unknown participation in combat.
Also, only 2 prototypes built. But, as seen in some photographs in the Eastern front, could be employed in action.
CS 2? Seriously? It seems to be manned by 1 crew. Some players could risk their luck bringing up front only to (if lucky) obtain a improbable hunt or an elite crew out of the wreck. Or perhaps you should create a note stating that in case of crew survival, this has to be represented by a 6+1 fanatical leader (fanatical because only a fanatic can be so foolish to man this vehicle; and the +1 because it's neeeded a fanatical, but stupid one to man it)
CS is used for armed vehicles, cs for unarmed. It does have one driver, but I believe (or assume/surmise) that there would be a second who would reload the PSKs, in the unlikely event that the vehicle survived its initial "shoot & scoot" attempt. Very much a close-quarters, kamikaze machine - desperate measures for desperate times.CS 2? Seriously? It seems to be manned by 1 crew. Some players could risk their luck bringing up front only to (if lucky) obtain a improbable hunt or an elite crew out of the wreck. Or perhaps you should create a note stating that in case of crew survival, this has to be represented by a 6+1 fanatical leader (fanatical because only a fanatic can be so foolish to man this vehicle; and the +1 because it's neeeded a fanatical, but stupid one to man it)
Only two prototypes built. Unknown participation in combat.
I think both pairs were sent for combat trials. The lack of production models speaks to the 'success' of those trials.Also, only 2 prototypes built. But, as seen in some photographs in the Eastern front, could be employed in action.
See Panzer Selbstfahrlafette 1c - Let's go Tank Hunting : tanks (reddit.com)
Running behind the veh loaded with rockets to reload in front of a (roaring) enemy? I doubt it very much. This was a semi-kamikaze AFV. If you hit... good. If not, pull back at full speed and see (if you're lucky) if you got a second chance. Nah. Opportunity weapon, nothing operational or to be relied as a regular weapon.CS is used for armed vehicles, cs for unarmed. It does have one driver, but I believe (or assume/surmise) that there would be a second who would reload the PSKs, in the unlikely event that the vehicle survived its initial "shoot & scoot" attempt. Very much a close-quarters, kamikaze machine - desperate measures for desperate times.
The Wanze carried 18 shells for reloading. The Borgwards were designed as munitions/personnel carriers, but proved unreliable/inadequate for the tasks. That's why they were re-purposed for demo/Wanze. The area behind the driver was where all the carrying happened. So a crew loader would sit at the back, with the ammo, and reload the PSK after firing. Still high-risk, low-survival.Running behind the veh loaded with rockets to reload in front of a (roaring) enemy? I doubt it very much. This was a semi-kamikaze AFV. If you hit... good. If not, pull back at full speed and see (if you're lucky) if you got a second chance. Nah. Opportunity weapon, nothing operational or to be relied as a regular weapon.
Ok. You've got your point. The explosives area could be reserved for reloads. I don't see the space for reloader, but it's clear that you've made your research, so, it's Ok. But even so, a CS of 2 is very high possibility of survival for this machine... Perhaps because of the combined power of the loaded and not reloaded charges. It merits the cathegory not of a burning wreck, but a pulverized wreckThe Wanze carried 18 shells for reloading. The Borgwards were designed as munitions/personnel carriers, but proved unreliable/inadequate for the tasks. That's why they were re-purposed for demo/Wanze. The area behind the driver was where all the carrying happened. So a crew loader would sit at the back, with the ammo, and reload the PSK after firing. Still high-risk, low-survival.
How about I make it red? Can't go lower than 2.Ok. You've got your point. The explosives area could be reserved for reloads. I don't see the space for reloader, but it's clear that you've made your reseach, so, it's Ok. But even so, a CS of 2 is very high possibility of survival for this machine... Perhaps because of the combined power of the loaded and not reloaded charges. It merits the cathegory not of a burning wreck, but a pulverized wreck
D5.7 Interesting... Yes, I think this could do to (abstractly) represent the AFVHow about I make it red? Can't go lower than 2.