Boards for next AP...

[Fort]

I'm not extremely familiar with VASL, but aren't these boards going to pose a problem with the current configuration process?

http://docs.google.com/View?id=ddbmp44t_157ddkzfpdj

 

[Kevin Kenneally]

those are "dope"!!!!
errr...or "the bomb"!
or, "RAD!!!"
or, "*****in'"!!
:smoke:

Chris,

The maps are nice.... But as far as you go.......?

 

[Canadian Dude]

You know that with these boards we have reached a new level of decadance in ASL that no other wargame has experienced. Kinda feels naughty and nice at the same time.

My question is, though, when is this board thing going to stop? When (if?) the SK-style mapboard set comes out, the entire series is going to weigh more than the original 52 mounted boards!

Would you complain about too much sex?

No, I didn't think so. :bite:

I'm not dead yet!

I think it's a huge mistake to not include them, and I'll keep on fighting for them every inch of the way.

There is absolutely no reason why CG terrain should not be in Chapter B, IMHO.

Completely Agree. Loved that board way more when it had the slopes. Keep up the fight for the end of Chapter B slop segregation.

- The Canadian Dude

 

[Tuomo]

I'm not extremely familiar with VASL, but aren't these boards going to pose a problem with the current configuration process?

With the workaround, there's no problem. You need to download a board called NUL, and place it accordingly. This board is one pixel wide, so VASL lets you create a proper 2x2 board configuration without looking goofy.

Well, without THE BOARD looking goofy. You know.

 

[Morbii]

Boards look fantastic.

And I notice the slopes went away.

huh? You can play PTO on any map.

err... oh...

 

[JVan]

Beautiful boards. I can't wait to get my hands on them.

 

[J. R. Tracy]

I'm not dead yet!

I think it's a huge mistake to not include them, and I'll keep on fighting for them every inch of the way.

There is absolutely no reason why CG terrain should not be in Chapter B, IMHO.

Keep fighting the good fight, Fort - they're easy enough to ignore for scenario designers that wish to - make them activated by SSR only.

JR

 

[wrongway149]

Keep fighting the good fight, Fort - they're easy enough to ignore for scenario designers that wish to - make them activated by SSR only.

JR

I'm not a 'slope guy', but Gary's method of introducing a few slopes on an an occaisonal board is an acceptable compromise. Might be a good way to learn them , like any other new rule or terrain feature.

 

[Fort]

These are in all probability the final version of these boards...they are not in Hi Res, but you get the idea.

 

[chris_olden]

Fort, those are FANTASTIC.

 

[Fort]

Fort, those are FANTASTIC.

Chuckles Keebler does great work in that little elf factory in MD.

 

[John McDiarmid]

Some of the scenarios that use the boards were pretty good when I was part of the Oktoberfest group that playtested them also.

 

[Kevin Kenneally]

Chuckles Keebler does great work in that little elf factory in MD.

Hey Fort,

Will you be giving Mr Charlie and his map elfs a Christmas (yeah I said Christmas :angry bonus..... :laugh:

 

[dlazov]

Wow, these are freaking awsome. Charlie needs to redo all the old maps...

 

[Chas]

Gary,

I really lilke this concept and the options it ads. This, along with our DW stuff, really opens a lot for scenario design. It definitely has me pumped up.

Thanks,
chas

 

[Psycho]

Chuckles Keebler does great work in that little elf factory in MD.

He makes great cookies too! :yummy:

 

[King Billy]

They do look very good. I would however prefer the white line to show the crest where there is woods, grain, brush on two levels of the hill.

I don't know what others think, but I like to be able to see the full crest.

Bill

 

[Fort]

This is a VASL photo of the map configuration for one of the scenarios I am working on for the next FKM AP. It's for a contested river crossing in Italy...

 

[Canadian Dude]

Good God...

 

[Spencer Armstrong]

Oh. Heck. Yes.

S