Trezza
Senior Member
Regarding SSR 3, dug in AFV's are inherently immobilized and never take an immobilization TC. Does this SSR alter the dug in AFV rules? What is the intent of this SSR as this scenario looks unplayable at this point.
BFP 17 Errata?
- Thread starter Trezza
- Start date
Chas
Elder Member
- Joined
- May 2, 2004
- Messages
- 2,504
- Reaction score
- 1,816
- Country
-
Gary,
Special rules are to change standard rules. If 'hit' per the SBR, they take the immobilization TC with a +1 DRM.
Perhaps we should have worded this in an excepting manner rather than just stating what happens.
How does following the Dug-in AFV rule and a SBR to make them possibly take an immobilization TC make the scenario unplayable?
Chas
Special rules are to change standard rules. If 'hit' per the SBR, they take the immobilization TC with a +1 DRM.
Perhaps we should have worded this in an excepting manner rather than just stating what happens.
How does following the Dug-in AFV rule and a SBR to make them possibly take an immobilization TC make the scenario unplayable?
Chas