I understand that, but this wasn't a regular season game it was a bowl game. Bowl games should be played on neutral ground. For the record, I think LSU would have won that game no matter where it was played.
Well, since bowl games aren't play-off games your position relative to "neutral ground" is invalid. IOW, the game doesn't matter except for team pride anyway.
Second, bowl games are played where the money says they are played. If anyone doesn't like that...tough, that's just the way it is. If Green Bay, Detroit, Boston, NY, etc., wants to get up $10-15Million and start a bowl then we can talk about it...till then, again "neutral ground" argument is invalid.
Lastly, if the northern teams agreed with you then they can simply stop accepting the bids to the bowls. Of course that puts them out of not only National Champ contention...it also puts them out of many $millions$ of dollars for their programs. Again, "neutral ground" excuses...invalid.
As I said, I vote that your team plays its next bowl game in Boston, Baltimore, or Green Bay.
Cool...when you (or I) actually get a vote that will matter.
BTW, part of the problem (assuming one thinks it is a problem) is that bowls in those locations will ultimately fail because of one simple reason...NO BODY (fans) wants to go to a game in those locations in freaking JANUARY!!! Sure, the local nuts will show up for the game and sit in -10 degree weather but a bowl isn't gonna make it with a half full stadium. The BCS/major bowls are located in otherwise high draw tourism locations
AS WELL AS generally good weather locations for a January date.
BTW, a play-off system would solve this problem. The top cede teams get to play at home up until the title game. A play-off system also solves the lay-off problem.
Imagine a FL, USC, LSU and BSU 2nd round!!! (replace the Orange bowl with the FL vs OSU game).