B9.322 and Concealment Loss

da priest

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2003
Messages
2,783
Reaction score
10
Location
Lebanon, Mo., turn r
New rules interaction,

1. assume German in Level 0 bldg Concealed(hex G45 RB map)
2. across street is another bldg and a wall hexside facing German unit with Russian concealed unit in Level 0(hex G43 RB map)
3. russ does not have WA in Ger MPh
4. Concealed German unit Assault Moves for 1 MF into the road claiming WA.
5. Same but German uses 2MF for shellholes.

Now does German lose Concealment in either or both cases, if Russian momentarily drops Concealment?
 

Larry

Elder Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2003
Messages
5,397
Reaction score
1,755
Location
Guada La Habra
Country
llUnited States
The Bread Factory 2?

Unit uses assault movement in non-OG does not lose ?. By claiming WA, the unit loses the protection of the shellholes but is still not in OG, unless seen by other enemy whose LOS does not cross the wall. See e.g. J44. Not a case A or case B ? loss situation on the scenario described.
 

apbills

Elder Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2003
Messages
3,418
Reaction score
949
Location
Pewaukee, WI
Country
llUnited States
da priest said:
New rules interaction,

4. Concealed German unit Assault Moves for 1 MF into the road claiming WA.?
Receives the wall TEM, so is not in OG, retains ?
da priest said:
5. Same but German uses 2MF for shellholes.
Same

- Lesson learned, make sure you have WA over the adjacent hex.
 
Top