B9.32 WA and tank vs mmc interaction

da priest

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2003
Messages
2,783
Reaction score
10
Location
Lebanon, Mo., turn r
Brain f*rt here, vague recall that if a Tank has WA, and an opposing MMC moves next to same wall: the infantry unit gets the WA and the Tank loses it. :confused:

Am I right or was it the smoking:smoke: or drinking?:drink:
 

Ole Boe

Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2004
Messages
2,874
Reaction score
12
Location
there...
Country
llNorway
I cannot remember any such rule, and I should remember it if there is any, since I wrote it. Don't take my word for it though :p

The closest I can think of is that a vehicle cannot claim WA at all if having positive in-hex TEM (B9.32).
 

SamB

Shut up and play!
Joined
Jan 29, 2003
Messages
6,791
Reaction score
384
Location
Seattle, Washington,
Country
llUnited States
My rules aren't handy right now, but I think it says a vehicle can't claim wall advantage vs Infantry.

If so, the AFV loses WA if it has no friendly infantry in the hex.
 

da priest

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2003
Messages
2,783
Reaction score
10
Location
Lebanon, Mo., turn r
SamB said:
My rules aren't handy right now, but I think it says a vehicle can't claim wall advantage vs Infantry.

If so, the AFV loses WA if it has no friendly infantry in the hex.
That was my recall..but can't find the "rule"..maybe Boe took it out?:nervous:
 

WaterRabbit

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2004
Messages
2,566
Reaction score
27
Location
Somewhere
Country
llGreenland
ASLRB v2 said:
A unit may claim WA over a same level wall/hedge hexside if it is an armed, unbroken ground level unit which is not: a vehicle eligible to receive in-hex TEM of >= 1, etc.
This is all I can find. Notice unit, not infantry.
 
Top