B28.61 and TB DRM

Bill Kohler

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Messages
762
Reaction score
604
Location
North Carolina
First name
Bill
Country
llUnited States
B13.4212 says “whenever Infantry/Cavalry specifically use a TB to enter a hex at a reduced MF cost () or to escape minefield attack (), it is subject to a special -1 Defensive First Fire DRM due to its restricted movement options…”

B28.61 says “Units may enter a minefield hex via a TB at twice the normal MF/MP cost without coming under minefield attack, but are subject to the TB Defensive First Fire -1 DRM.”

Question: Does the TB DFF DRM ever apply to vehicles? (B13.4212 implies no, B28.61 implies yes (the MP comment).) If it applies to vehicles, does it also apply to To-Hit rolls?

------------------------------------
Response:

Delete "/MP" from B28.61 (which refers back to B13.4212, making it controlling). And that DRM is missing from the charts.

....Perry

-----------------------------------
Follow-on Comment:

Would the TB DFF DRM apply to ITT To Hit rolls?
 

bprobst

Elder Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2003
Messages
2,535
Reaction score
1,441
Location
Melbourne, Australia
First name
Bruce
Country
llAustralia
Whoa! This change means that vehicles can no longer use an existing TB to avoid minefield attacks when entering a minefield hex! Is that really Perry's intention?
 

Bill Kohler

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Messages
762
Reaction score
604
Location
North Carolina
First name
Bill
Country
llUnited States
A further response from Perry

Oops. That answer was wrong.

Instead, in B28.61, line 5, insert "Infantry/Cavalry" after" but" and before "are".

And when you quoted the ruling below, you left out part:
"For official answers write to asl_qa@multimanpublishing.com."

....Perry
MMP
Consider this answer official.
 
Top