ASL Scenario Hall of Fame

[RobZagnut]

Once again I am taking suggestions on new scenarios to be added to the ASL Scenario Hall of Fame (see Journal #4). Please send me up to ten scenarios that you think should be in the HoF. You can list them here (I am not on the ASLML) or send your suggestions to me at rwolkey@hotmail.com The scenarios must be published before 2002. So, any scenario published in 2001 or earlier qualifies.

Once I get all the scenarios the second round of voting will begin. I will post a list of all the scenarios with multiple votes. Each person can then vote for up to five scenarios. The Top 15 scenarios will make it to the final round. You will then vote YES or NO on each of those 15 scenarios you have played. If a scenario receives an 80% YES vote it will be admitted in the ASL Scenario Hall of Fame.

Please take this voting very seriously. I think the first set of HoF scenarios is an outstanding group of scenarios and I would like to see another stellar group added to them. Go ahead and discuss it in your forum/list/topic, but remember that you only get to send me up to 10 scenario suggestions. Thank you.

Robert Wolkey

 

[RobZagnut]

Could someone post this to the ASL Mailing list for me? Thanks.

 

[Nat Mallet]

Why does it have to be a scenario published in 2001 or earlier (I don't have Journal 4)?

Thanks,

Nat

 

[paulkenny]

can we get a quick list of whats in the HoF already?

 

[Gunner Scott]

You beat me to it Paul. :cheeky:

Scott

can we get a quick list of whats in the HoF already?

 

[zgrose]

Journal 4 page 16

Best Scenario
Acts of Defiance
Cold Crocodiles
Hill 621
White Tigers

Best Beginner/Teaching Scenario
The Puma Prowls
The Guards Counterattack
Gavin Take
Defiance on Hill 30

 

[Gunner Scott]

So this list can only be of official scenarios?


Scott

Journal 4 page 16

Best Scenario
Acts of Defiance
Cold Crocodiles
Hill 621
White Tigers

Best Beginner/Teaching Scenario
The Puma Prowls
The Guards Counterattack
Gavin Take
Defiance on Hill 30

 

[RobZagnut]

>Why does it have to be a scenario published in 2001 or earlier (I don't have Journal 4)?

It is modeled after the NFL Hall of Fame. We don't want a flash in the pan where everyone is exited about it only to discover later that it has flaws once it has been played a few times.

>So this list can only be of official scenarios?

No.

 

[da priest]

Could someone post this to the ASL Mailing list for me? Thanks.

Done.

 

[Fred Ingram]

Why does it have to be a scenario published in 2001 or earlier4)?

I would suppose for the same reason that baseball rookies are not voted to the hall of fame after thier first season (No matter how stellar a season it may have been) :nuts:

 

[paulkenny]

Scott to answer your question, I dont think it has to be official, hmm on second thought, since an article might be published by MMP........

 

[byouse]

Scott to answer your question, I dont think it has to be official, hmm on second thought, since an article might be published by MMP........

So 30 minutes earlier the person asking for the list says no, they don't have to be official. Yet you still feel the need to try and make this an MMP mudfight?

Your act is nearly as tired as Holsts.

 

[Jay White]

I didn't see Rob Wolkey's "No" - maybe Paul didn't see it either.

-Jay

 

[byouse]

Don't you read the posts sequentially? Otherwise how would you "follow" a conversation?

 

[Commissar Piotr]

Hi Guys

That got to be the reason, Brian reads every single word and have never glanced over a text. This means we got to wait until 2069 before we get to see the next Journal. Not to mention AoO.

Brian, relax. If Jay did not see it he did not and that means someone else could have missed it as well. It was a stupid remark by Paul but most understood the intention.

 

[Jay White]

I'm not defending anyone - I'm just sayin', I didn't see it either.

When I read through I sometimes scan - easy to miss a single word answer like "no"

 

[ross]

top ten Hall of Fame nominees

my ten favorite scenarios published before 2002:

1. Urban Guerillas (Journal J001; ROAR has G94/R100, 7.33 rating)
2. One Down, Two to Go (RB #1; R28/G26, 7.24)
3. Totsugeki (Annual A060; C99/J125, 7.54)
4. Merzenhausen Zoo (J019; G37/A28, 7.55)
5. Jungle Citadel (ASL #71; C19/J21, 7.53)
6. Eye of the Tiger (WCW #7; R78/G73, 7.39)
7. The Awakening of Spring (General G33; R29/G27, 7.38)
8. Maggot Hill (A117; A14/J17, 7.61)
9. Armored Probe (CH#006; A34/J41, 7.00)
10. Pomeranian Tigers (SP011; R36/G31, 6.85)

Not sure if you're opening up nominees for Teaching Scenarios, but here's two I'd like to see added:
Guns - Zon with the Wind (A032; G154/A159, 7.01)
Desert - High Danger (View from the Trenches V#01)

 

[Gunner Scott]

Here are my top ten picks:

1. Art Nouvou DB 88
2. Breezless Day AP3
3. Smashing the 3rd J24
4. Panzer Graveyard J32
5. Last Stand at Iserland SP37
6. Double or Nothing CH48
7. No Further red Barricades CH15
8. The Citadel BV10
9. One Down, Two to Go RB1
10. Point of no Return WoA 42

Well there you have it, my list.

Scott

 

[paulkenny]

So 30 minutes earlier the person asking for the list says no, they don't have to be official. Yet you still feel the need to try and make this an MMP mudfight?

Your act is nearly as tired as Holsts.

ESCUSE ME?? I admit that I did miss the response from Wolkey that scenarios dont have to be official. I DONT believe my response was a slam at MMP. I commented on the fact that previously the HoF was an article in a MMP magazine. I think logic follows that you would want the scenarios to be official. That aint mud.

And I take umbrage to your last statement.

If you have a problem with my criticisms of MMP, please be more forthcoming with what they are.

 

[byouse]

ESCUSE ME?? I admit that I did miss the response from Wolkey that scenarios dont have to be official. I DONT believe my response was a slam at MMP. I commented on the fact that previously the HoF was an article in a MMP magazine. I think logic follows that you would want the scenarios to be official. That aint mud.

And I take umbrage to your last statement.

If you have a problem with my criticisms of MMP, please be more forthcoming with what they are.

I have no problems with anyone's criticisms of MMP, but when the dogpile starts I know where to find your posts.

If you in fact missed the author of the post saying no they don't have to be official then my apologies.