Oh yeahhh. With this on preorder, PIF out soon - & hopefully more from George K & Xavier, 2016 looks like it could be a really good year.I see that KWASL is now on Pre-order, mmmmhhhh, wonder who is gonna get that.
I'm sure I will, mainly to see the new rules it offers and those hill maps.:hog:I see that KWASL is now on Pre-order, mmmmhhhh, wonder who is gonna get that.
Where's the Images Dude, we must have images!Just seen the hill maps, is that all that will be in the module?, seems a bit light, or am I expecting a bit to much.
http://www.multimanpublishing.com/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=3nD73QJ1U10=&tabid=58Where's the Images Dude, we must have images!
I think Lot were expecting more Mark, not very inspiring map boards IMHO.I am a little disappointed in the rectangular hill configuration. It's just an 8" x22" hill, blown up, basically. I was hoping for more imaginative major hill configurations, I confess.
It depends upon what you are comparing to. About right for a AH/early MMP core at 4 maps, which would have been mounted, but light compared to MMP reprints. I suppose not having to 'catch up' on 52 already published existing maps means that the number of maps is low. We have been spoilt recently, between core reprints and a veritable flood of APs. The only surprise for me is that they are numbered K1-K4.Just seen the hill maps, is that all that will be in the module?, seems a bit light, or am I expecting a bit to much.
Image with counters. Already started a new Armory file.Where's the Images Dude, we must have images!
I saw on the ASL Facebook group page that Chas or Perry (from MMP) said that the 'K' is just a place holder for now and that the mapboards should have a number that is consistent with the rest of the ASL maps.The only surprise for me is that they are numbered K1-K4.
This is an official 4-board hill, if you look closely, not just 2. Plus the "corners" are geomorphic (or are on my playtest maps) so there is more than one way to set them up.The only surprise for me is that they are numbered K1-K4.
EDIT: I see Mark P complaining about the hill configuration. While I will agree it is not the most imaginative, we still have boards 2, 9 15, 39, 50, 58, 60, 5a/b and 8a/b that have sizeable hills. If you have got BFP's HG2 then you have the combined H & I (reprint of HoB's I & II) 2 board hill as well as J & K separate hills. We could do with an official 2 board hill, because although BFP H&I/HoB I&II are great, they will see no service in official and many TPP scenarios.
Hopefully you are right.I don't think that will be the final cover.