Blackcloud6
Elder Member
Try Twitter. It makes Facebook look like an old ladies tea party.Other than that, I find Fb too time consuming, too. And a very toxic place.
Try Twitter. It makes Facebook look like an old ladies tea party.Other than that, I find Fb too time consuming, too. And a very toxic place.
I have a new name for FB. Spybook.Try Twitter. It makes Facebook look like an old ladies tea party.
Actually - FB might be toxic politics-wise but not game-wise. FB is certainly more cordial game-wise than GS. Privacy-wise I give the same info on GS & on FB. Twitter is hardly toxic if you limit yourself to ASL.Other than that, I find Fb too time consuming, too. And a very toxic place.
That might be true but FB puts a cookie on your computer that lets them track you when you visit other sites. They can combine all your visits so they get a profile of everything you do. The information you type in is piffle. Gamesquad could use its cookies in the same way, but they just aren't a big enough organization to pull it off.Privacy-wise I give the same info on GS & on FB.
Yup. That's what all the cookie/ script/ ad blocking extensions are for.That might be true but FB puts a cookie on your computer that lets them track you when you visit other sites. They can combine all your visits so they get a profile of everything you do. The information you type in is piffle. Gamesquad could use its cookies in the same way, but they just aren't a big enough organization to pull it off.
JR
Same here .. actually I have no non-ASL connections on FB. Non-ASL folks don't even know I am on FB.Here's the trick to FB. Join the Groups you enjoy, bookmark this link https://www.facebook.com/bookmarks/groups and only enter FB from that link.
I don't even look at my feed/wall anymore. I mainly use FB for Groups only.
Oh dear. They might even begin to show me advertisements for stuff I would specifically be interested in. My God, that would be terrible.That might be true but FB puts a cookie on your computer that lets them track you when you visit other sites. They can combine all your visits so they get a profile of everything you do.
They are making money off information that would have been mostly private before the internet. You are giving away your value for free. Some people don't have a problem with that. But perhaps the fact that you are, say, pre-diabetic or a smoker, is given to a potential employer, and that potential employer decides not to offer you a job based on that information because it will keep their insurance costs down. Once you release your information it may be used in ways you may not anticipate or appreciate.Oh dear. They might even begin to show me advertisements for stuff I would specifically be interested in. My God, that would be terrible.
Has any of that ever happened?They are making money off information that would have been mostly private before the internet. You are giving away your value for free. Some people don't have a problem with that. But perhaps the fact that you are, say, pre-diabetic or a smoker, is given to a potential employer, and that potential employer decides not to offer you a job based on that information because it will keep their insurance costs down. Once you release your information it may be used in ways you may not anticipate or appreciate.
JR
It hasn't happened in exactly the way I said yet, but the pieces are starting to fall into place: https://www.webmd.com/smoking-cessation/news/20200103/uhaul-wont-hire-smokers-vapers-in-21-states In this case they aren't using information from an "internet profile" to guide them, but it's not a giant leap to see that it probably will be done. You may not want to control your information, but others want to use your information to control you.Has any of that ever happened?
Constant vigilance is the price of living in the information age. A great amount of work went into making changes for y2k. If it had not been done it probably wouldn't have been the end of the world. That's television weather-speak. But it would not have been good, and it had the potential for being very bad in some cases. And that it was not very bad is because people did something about it, not because they went all Mary Sunshine.I remember Y2K going to be the near end of civilization as we knew it. It turned out to be a big nothing burger.
If businesses aren't hiring smokers, isn't there an obvious solution to someone wanting to be employed?It hasn't happened in exactly the way I said yet, but the pieces are starting to fall into place: https://www.webmd.com/smoking-cessation/news/20200103/uhaul-wont-hire-smokers-vapers-in-21-states In this case they aren't using information from an "internet profile" to guide them, but it's not a giant leap to see that it probably will be done.
That's what unions are for. Progressive discipline, and termination with cause. But the solution there is pretty easy, too. If you're going to trash your employer, maybe don't commit it to writing.I mean, in real life the story's a lot simpler. Folks got fired because their "friends" captured what they said on private chats and sent that to management.
Use targeted data to get them hooked on tobacco, then use targeted data to punish them for it? You go! That's giving them the old in-and-out.If businesses aren't hiring smokers, isn't there an obvious solution to someone wanting to be employed?
Don't talk about it on the internet, I guess. If you have a physical ailment, tell your doctor, and look to advice from immediate family and close friends. That's what phones are for.What is the obvious solution for someone whose family has a history of heart trouble?