Armored Cupolas as Hindrances (D9.5)

commissar1969

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
543
Reaction score
209
Location
Martin, TN
Country
llUnited States
See D9.5

Citizens:

Here's the problem:

On the one hand, and Armored Cupola represents and Immobilized tank in every way except where stated.
On the other, a destroyed Armored Cupola leaves no wreck.

Does a functional Armored Cupola still present a Hindrance to same-level LOS?

Thanks,

Commissar
 
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
222
Reaction score
152
Location
Paris area
Country
llFrance
From Q/A :
D9.3, D9.4 & D9.5 Armored Cupolas are considered to be equivalent to an Immobile tank. Does this mean that Armored Cupolas that are not "Dug-In AFVs" provide TEM and Hindrance
benefits?
A.Yes. [Letter77]
 
Top