Armored Assault question

Hexagoner

Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2004
Messages
672
Reaction score
36
Location
Colorado, USA
A stack includes an M4 Sherman, 8-1 leader, MMG/768, DC/768. and 348. The stack moves down a road 3 hexes (3MF/3MP). Next the tank pays 1 MP to stop and the DC/768 and 348 pay 1 MF to search (becoming TI and can't move further).

Can the tank start and continue to armored assault with the 8-1,MMG/768 for 3 more hexes (6MF, 8MP) and the tank spends 1 more MP to stop (6MF,9MP)?
 

EagleIV

Elder Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Messages
1,881
Reaction score
1,063
Location
California
Country
llUnited States
It depends. When the squad and HS declared a search, they had to split from the 8-1 and MMG/768, the stack with the leader was not allowed to spend any MF at that time and would not be subject to any DF at that time. The question is did the tank continue moving with the leader or did it continue moving with the searching units?
If it moved with the searching units, then the tank could not continue moving
If the tank designated that it was going to continue with the leader, the searching units would not receive any TEM from the tank since the tank and searching units were no longer moving together (and the searching units might be subject to FFMO if they were fired upon during that last MF.
 

Hexagoner

Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2004
Messages
672
Reaction score
36
Location
Colorado, USA
Yes, the tank continues moving with the 8-1,MMG/768. Of course, once the tank moves out of the searching units hex, the searching units can't be fired upon again in the MPh. I would think the searching units would receive 0 TEM (nam and tank +1) while searching since still part of the armored assault at that moment.
 

EagleIV

Elder Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Messages
1,881
Reaction score
1,063
Location
California
Country
llUnited States
First From A4.2 if you split a moving stack, one part of that former stack must finish moving before continuing with the rest. So if you split the stack to have some units search they must spend the 1MF to search separate from the rest of the stack and are no longer considered moving as part of that stack even though they may remain the the same location. This means that if the units searching want the protection of the AFV from Armored Assault, the AFV MUST be part of searching stack and is no longer part of the leader stack. Also see the Q&A below.

A4.8, A12.152, & D9.31
An AFV and an MMC declare Armored Assault (without declaring Assault Movement) and as a stack move into a new hex where
the un-Pinned MMC now wants to make a Search attempt. According to A12.152 “Regardless of the outcome, that unit or moving
stack is TI for the remainder of that Player Turn.” But according to A4.8: “TI status is incurred by Infantry engaged in various
tasks...” (i.e., the AFV is not subject to TI status). So is the Search allowed despite the AFV not being subject to TI?
A. Yes, but the AFV must end its MPh with the searchers

If the AFV wants to continue with the leader, then while the searching units are searching, they are no longer moving with the AFV and no longer get any protection from it.

I would think the searching units would receive 0 TEM (nam and tank +1) while searching since still part of the armored assault at that moment.
In this case the tank is no longer moving with the leader, it is moving with the searching units.
 
Top