Armored assault and concealment

[Markdv5208]

Ok, I Armored assaulted with a unit from OFF map.

I announced ASSAULT MOVE and ARMORED ASSAULT

QUestion
Did I maintain concealment?

Jeffs dice rendered the question moot ie 448 rolled a 6,4 then SFFed and rolled a 5,5.

But I wonder did I maintain concealment?

Mark De Vries

 

[Reepicheep]

Was the assault move into open ground? If so, I don't see any reason why you would maintain concealment. If you assault moved into concealment terrain, however, you'd have maintained concealment.

 

[Commissar Piotr]

Hi Guys

Armored assault negates Open Ground and since it is moving in Open Ground that strips concealment and not wether you move in concealment terrain or not you will keep concealment since assault moving in non-OG.

 

[tommyl]

Was the assault move into open ground? If so, I don't see any reason why you would maintain concealment. If you assault moved into concealment terrain, however, you'd have maintained concealment.

Wouldn't the +1 TEM from the armoured assualting tank negate FFMO, making it not open ground and thus allow you to keep concealment?

 

[Reepicheep]

Quite right. I just checked the chart and yes, the Tanks +1 tem would negate FFMO therefore allow concealment to be maintained.

 

[Tater]

Ok, I Armored assaulted with a unit from OFF map.

I announced ASSAULT MOVE and ARMORED ASSAULT

QUestion
Did I maintain concealment?

Jeffs dice rendered the question moot ie 448 rolled a 6,4 then SFFed and rolled a 5,5.

But I wonder did I maintain concealment?

Yes, you would keep '?'...this is a classic tactic.