GeorgeBates
Elder Member
Wow, given that transistor receivers were commercially available as early as 1954 I'm surprised the military was not making use of them sooner. I'm sure someone here knows the reason.
That would be odd, as transistors are inherently more reliable and perform better than vacuum tube sets precisely because they are solid state.I would guess reliability and that possibly they were not convenient to produce according to Mil specs with limited numbers
One might say that government procurement in general, and military procurement in particular are unnatural events best understood by sacrificing a goat and examining its liver.That would be odd,
Vacuum tubes are more resistant to emp generated by nuclear detonations. I suspect one reason they hung around so long is that there was some expectation that tactical nuclear weapons would be used.That would be odd, as transistors are inherently more reliable and perform better than vacuum tube sets precisely because they are solid state.
Yes, this makes sense. An examination of the military training regimes in the first world nations in the 1950s and 1960s shows a huge emphasis on atomic/nuclear warfare. In Canada, as an example, the reserve army was restructured from a warfighting outlook to a civil defence one.Vacuum tubes are more resistant to emp generated by nuclear detonations. I suspect one reason they hung around so long is that there was some expectation that tactical nuclear weapons would be used.
Actually, it's " always remember that every piece of your weapon was made by the lowest bidder."What was that we said, "Marines make do?"
But at an exorbitant price!Actually, it's " always remember that every piece of your weapon was made by the lowest bidder."
Which is why we "improvise, adapt, and overcome...."But at an exorbitant price!
We always got a kick out of taking the stock off the lower receiver of the M16A1 and seeing the stamp "Mattel, Inc." on the receiver mount plate.My all time favorite was a very little $60.00 radio knob (Yup, just the knob with a small paint mark to indicate what channel you're on, and a small set screw-not even the post that it adhered to). Courtesy of Hughes Manufacturing!
No idea, George, but my father's company was manufacturing vacuum tubes for restoring antique jukebox amplifiers well into the early -2000's, until he had his first stroke and slowed down in life. (He had bought the machinery from Honeywell in 1974 for a song thanks to transistors taking over nearly everything.)Wow, given that transistor receivers were commercially available as early as 1954 I'm surprised the military was not making use of them sooner. I'm sure someone here knows the reason.
Yep.There is still a strong market for restoration projects and vacuum tubes.
C'mon, Kenn.... I know you wanna....After spending nearly 20 years on the Korean War module, I'm burned out on ASL design and development, but if I wasn't, the Arab-Israeli wars would be my next project.
C'mon, Kenn.... I know you wanna....
I'll do your maps... ;-)
... So you're saying there's a chance...OK, I admit it. I do want to do it. In fact, the project is on my wish list of things to do. It is sandwiched in between:
I will leave it as an exercise to the reader to determine which of those things is immediately above a new ASL project on my wish list, and which is below it.
- Be captured by Al Qaeda while while wearing a dogtag that has J on it, and
- Reliving the 2016 US presidential election.