klasmalmstrom
Forum Guru
I don't know what MTB is either.Yes. Oops! Should have been MTB - Dumb! I'll correct it.
I don't know what MTB is either.Yes. Oops! Should have been MTB - Dumb! I'll correct it.
MBT = Main Battle TankI don't know what MTB is either.
Mountain Bike?I don't know what MTB is either.
As I said, it would only be HASL rules that had already been established in a previous HASL, and a product in the pipeline intended to use them.Considering how HASL rules (or any product for that matter) tend to fluctuate during the development process, I am not sure adding in future stuff would be a wise choice.
But even a HASL in the pipeline intended to use them, might require alterations of them during development.As I said, it would only be HASL rules that had already been established in a previous HASL, and a product in the pipeline intended to use them.
This sounds perfectly awful.Bypass 'amendment' to the Anti-Tank Ditches by BFP.
Didn't the North Koreans mount some T34-85 turrets on patrol boats, as well? I seem to recall them sinking a South Korean vessel back in the '00s during a border clash, but for the life of me I can't find any online references to support that memory...MBT = Main Battle Tank
MTB = Motor Torpedo Boat
The Soviets sort of combined both by using tank turrets (T-34, T-28) on some of their riverine patrol craft. They did the same with trains.
The difference is that Hakkaa Päälle! is a core module, not an HASL, so new rules there are folded into the ASLRB. Some HASL features have made it on to geomorphic maps and are thus also found in the rule book.Is there a list somewhere of the different HASL unique terrain types? Hakkaa Paalle is far newer than RB but it added a new terrain type.
Yes, I don't see that any HASL rules will be included in a printed 3rd Edition rulebook.I see it as perfectly reasonable for any new editions of the rulebook to contain just the core rules not entirely different from what the 2nd ed pocket rules is now. Then the HASL rules to come separately in later prints of these HASLs or downloadable updates, as need dictates.
Even with an eASLRB, I'm not sure there would be higher frequency of official errata. The current pace is not tied to the rules being in a paper format.If there were an eASLRB some day, I would really like it to contain the integrity of chapter H and to be updated continuously with the new errata - even having to pay for the updates.