nebel
Share and Enjoy
Use the scenario archive which has a wealth of info about each scenario: www.aslscenarioarchive.comMaybe. This should be a data point in ROAR to come to an average play time. :dontknow
Use the scenario archive which has a wealth of info about each scenario: www.aslscenarioarchive.comMaybe. This should be a data point in ROAR to come to an average play time. :dontknow
Not if we can't find it. Where is it?It's partially active. You can begin using the scenario review function immediately.
I believe you're right. Fixed.I just submitted a report - please note that the complexity notes are a little baffling - I am not sure what excellent etc means. Something like Not Complex to Very Complex would work better for that notation.
Thank youI believe you're right. Fixed.
Unfortunately, that is beyond the capabilities of the system. If you want to actually rate a scenario, you have to start your own review.I wonder if all subsequent feedback on the same scenarios be funnelled back into the first review threads and have ratings from different players of the same scenario aggregated.
If that's the case, I just don't see the system being that useful. We already have the AAR section, as well as the general discussion section, for focused discussions on particular scenarios. People have been looking up GS discussions on Scenario X for years. It's a good thing.Unfortunately, that is beyond the capabilities of the system. If you want to actually rate a scenario, you have to start your own review.
As I said above, this isn't intended as a substitute for a dedicated system like the scenario archive. A system like that is intended primarily as a resource to collect and aggregate stats on a given scenario, which is well beyond the scope of the GS software. This is a discussion forum, so the scenario reviews here are primarily aimed at facilitating discussions on particular scenarios.
So should Gunner Scott's thread be deleted?If that's the case, I just don't see the system being that useful. If it can't do that, then why add capabilities that don't bring anything new to the table?
I thought AARs are where folks will offer suggestions on setup, tactics etc.Hopefully, people will eventually begin to chime in on these reviews and use them to offer suggestions on setup, tactics, etc.
Scott's been posting that many?Because almost every day people post up a new thread relating their experiences and likes/dislikes with a scenario. These are quite different than AARs, and are more about discussing a given scenario than detailing what happened in a particular playing.
No - but he didn't use the new Product Review section either. (We are DELETING people's threads now?)So should Gunner Scott's thread be deleted?
Sorry, I'm with Tom on this. If there's no aggregation, it's just forum clutter and better removed en toto.Thoughts on how to improve it are welcome.
It wasn’t yet active when he posted that thread. Plus people didn’t even know about it yet.“hongkongwargamer” said:He didn't use the new Product Review section either. (We are DELETING people's threads now?)