AFV Concealment Loss

[A_T_Great]

A close topped AFV concealed in a building hex is hit with ATT fire. There is no possible PTC result on the IFT because FP is 1/2fp. Does it A: Lose concealment because it is a vehicle hit by ordinance, or B: Not lose concealment because it is not attacked on the IFT resulting in at least a PTC?
Thanks

 

[klasmalmstrom]

It loses Concealment.

Case A in the Concealment Gain/Loss Table:
"...is a vehicle hit by ordnance, ..."

A12.2:
"...A concealed vehicle in the LOS of a Good Order enemy ground unit (regardless of range) loses its concealment if hit on a To Hit Table, ..."

 

[A_T_Great]

It loses Concealment.

Case A in the Concealment Gain/Loss Table:
"...is a vehicle hit by ordnance, ..."

A12.2:
"...A concealed vehicle in the LOS of a Good Order enemy ground unit (regardless of range) loses its concealment if hit on a To Hit Table, ..."

Thanks, I wasn't sure, it being area target type.

 

[jrv]

A use for a light MTR in urban terrain is to strip concealment from vehicles in buildings/rubble. They won't have any effect, but they can hit pretty easily.

JR

 

[Eagle4ty]

Thanks, I wasn't sure, it being area target type.

Not only is it hit by ordnance but it is hit by the ordinance.