Martin
Member
AFV concealment loss question:
AFV A is firing its gun at range 4 at AFV B which is BU, concealed and in a stone building. AFV B doesn’t fire back in order to keep concealment for as long as possible.
Question:
1. Do I use Area Fire or vehicle target type?
2. What are the modifiers for that shot?
3. What result is necessary to make AFV B loose concealment? (the concealment loss table case A states: “is a vehicle hit by ordnance” but what does “hit” exactly mean?)
--------------------------------------------------
Area fire question:
There seems to be a contradiction in the rules regarding Area Fire. C.4 states that:
“Ordnance Area Fire never never halves the FP effect of any hit. Instead, any shot affected by any provision of Area Fire caused by the target’s status uses the Case K (+2 vs. concealed target) To Hit DRM (6.2).”
But at the same time rule C3.33 states that:
“All units hit by HE are attacked on the IFT using a single DR and half the FP of the firing ordnance”.
Is the effect halved or not and are the two above rules contradictory?
Thanks
Martin
AFV A is firing its gun at range 4 at AFV B which is BU, concealed and in a stone building. AFV B doesn’t fire back in order to keep concealment for as long as possible.
Question:
1. Do I use Area Fire or vehicle target type?
2. What are the modifiers for that shot?
3. What result is necessary to make AFV B loose concealment? (the concealment loss table case A states: “is a vehicle hit by ordnance” but what does “hit” exactly mean?)
--------------------------------------------------
Area fire question:
There seems to be a contradiction in the rules regarding Area Fire. C.4 states that:
“Ordnance Area Fire never never halves the FP effect of any hit. Instead, any shot affected by any provision of Area Fire caused by the target’s status uses the Case K (+2 vs. concealed target) To Hit DRM (6.2).”
But at the same time rule C3.33 states that:
“All units hit by HE are attacked on the IFT using a single DR and half the FP of the firing ordnance”.
Is the effect halved or not and are the two above rules contradictory?
Thanks
Martin