A9.4 Mandatory Fire Direction vs B30.7 Concealment (in Pillbox)

James Taylor

I love women with brains
Joined
Jun 28, 2005
Messages
6,486
Reaction score
377
Location
Michigan
Country
llUnited States
Situation is German HMG (7FP) and German MMG (5FP) firing at >16 range at an infantry target in a pillbox for a base total of 12FP.

A9.4 says:

...moreover, MG attacks vs unconcealed Infantry at a range ≥ 17 hexes treat those Infantry as concealed unless they are broken/berserk/overstacked...

B30.7 says:

“?”/HIP in a pillbox neither halves the FP of, nor adds a TH DRM to, an attack on it/its-contents.

Q: Are MG attacks vs unbroken, non-overstacked, good order infantry in a PB at >16 range halved for concealment, i.e. is the FP of this attack above 6FP or 2FP?


No; 6 FP.


....Perry

MMP
 
Top