A7.302 and Leaders

Nineteen Kilo

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2005
Messages
795
Reaction score
323
Location
Fair Oaks CA
Country
llUnited States
A 7.302 K/# reads as follows: "At least one target unit suffers Casualty Reduction in each specifically targeted Location and all other target units (including any just reduced HS) must take a MC adding the number indicated (#) to the MC DR..."

So the way I have always played this is if a leader is the unfortunate sole to be randomly determined as taking the Casualty Reduction - he would be wounded and if he survives the wound severity roll, he is off the hook for the ensuing MC.

The rule I follow, it's the rationale I don't. Why should a squad suffer casualty reduction and then have to undergo the ensuing MC (possibly ending the whole event as a broken half-squad) when a leader gets to avoid the MC?

Another way to phrase the question is why does a randomly selected Leader (assuming he survives the wound severity roll) always end the shot in GO while squads can end up broken?

Kurious Kev
 
Last edited:

Mister T

Elder Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2006
Messages
4,204
Reaction score
1,683
Location
Bruxelles
Country
llFrance
A leader may suffer a mortal wound. It balances treatment. You compare best case for SMC (alive) with worst case for MMC (broken).
 

Nineteen Kilo

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2005
Messages
795
Reaction score
323
Location
Fair Oaks CA
Country
llUnited States
A leader may suffer a mortal wound. It balances treatment. You compare best case for SMC (alive) with worst case for MMC (broken).
Ah but might not the squad end up 100% KIA (worst case) if they roll on "12" on their ensuing MC?

It seems to me to have every Leader get wounded and ring out with, "I'm hit, but I'm ok, you boys carry on!" rather than, "Oh God I'm hit, I'm going to die here!" is a bit of stretch. ;)
 

Robin Reeve

The Swiss Moron
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jul 26, 2003
Messages
19,635
Reaction score
5,612
Location
St-Légier
First name
Robin
Country
llSwitzerland
A 12 MC DR casualty reduces a squad.
 

Brian W

Elder Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2003
Messages
7,216
Reaction score
1,027
Location
USA
Country
llUnited States
Why should a squad suffer casualty reduction and then have to undergo the ensuing MC (possibly ending the whole event as a broken half-squad) when a leader gets to avoid the MC?
Think of it in terms of two half squads, not one squad. One of the half squads sufferes CR. The other half squad, along with any other friendly units, has to take a MC. The SMC either takes the MC or is CR, not both.
 

Nineteen Kilo

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2005
Messages
795
Reaction score
323
Location
Fair Oaks CA
Country
llUnited States
A 12 MC DR casualty reduces a squad.
My point was that the "12" would finish off the GO half squad that had to still undergo the MC. So the GO squad is reduced to GO half-squad due to CR, and then rolls a "12" on the ensuing MC = 100% dead.
 
Last edited:

Nineteen Kilo

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2005
Messages
795
Reaction score
323
Location
Fair Oaks CA
Country
llUnited States
Think of it in terms of two half squads, not one squad. One of the half squads sufferes CR. The other half squad, along with any other friendly units, has to take a MC. The SMC either takes the MC or is CR, not both.
Brian that is brilliant! So the half squad that takes the MC is not the same one that suffered casualty reduction, it's just one of the "all other target units". When thought of in this way the rule does indeed make sense to me. I award you with "Poster of the Day" status. (Don't let it go to your head. :) )
 
Last edited:
Top