Treadhead
Senior Member
> Question:Assume a Friendly "?" unit performs a concealment-loss activity in
> Open Ground. A Good Order enemy MMC is in clear LOS to the Friendly "?",
> which can be determined by the naked eye without aid of a thread. Is the enemy
> MMC required to challenge the move and force the Friendly unit to lose
> concealment?
No.
>Could such concealment be retained if the enemy unit failed to
> point out the LOS?
Such "?" could be retained if the enemy unit failed to impose "?" loss.
>Would the answers change if the LOS was clear, but it was
> not obvious without checking with a thread (i.e. not visible to the unaided
> eye)?
No.
>Are both players responsible for determining LOS when any concealed unit
> performs a concealment-loss activity in LOS of its respective enemy unit?
>
Both players are responsible for determining when "?" might be lost, but the "enemy" player [to adopt your terminology] is responsible for denying "?" gain/retention.
....Perry
MMP
> Open Ground. A Good Order enemy MMC is in clear LOS to the Friendly "?",
> which can be determined by the naked eye without aid of a thread. Is the enemy
> MMC required to challenge the move and force the Friendly unit to lose
> concealment?
No.
>Could such concealment be retained if the enemy unit failed to
> point out the LOS?
Such "?" could be retained if the enemy unit failed to impose "?" loss.
>Would the answers change if the LOS was clear, but it was
> not obvious without checking with a thread (i.e. not visible to the unaided
> eye)?
No.
>Are both players responsible for determining LOS when any concealed unit
> performs a concealment-loss activity in LOS of its respective enemy unit?
>
Both players are responsible for determining when "?" might be lost, but the "enemy" player [to adopt your terminology] is responsible for denying "?" gain/retention.
....Perry
MMP