Jon
Senior Member
QUESTION
Using the A10.531 Example, assume there is a German unit in J2 with the broken Russian unit.
Also assume there is no German unit in K4. It is the start of that Russian's unit rout
When determining the unit's rout destination (nearest in MF non-ignorable woods/building, determined
at start of its RtPh), MUST building K2 be the initially declared rout destination
(nearest non-ignorable woods/building at 2MF away), even though the unit may not
end its RtPh there due to the KEU in J2?
Basically, when determining a valid rout destination at the start of a units rout (A10.51),
does a Known enemy unit IN the same Location as the broken unit at the start of the
RtPh automatically preclude any ADJACENT woods/building from being a valid rout
target, since the broken unit may not END a RtPh there (A10.51)?
ANSWER
K2 must be declared initially; upon reaching K2, the router must re-figure his destination.
....Perry
Using the A10.531 Example, assume there is a German unit in J2 with the broken Russian unit.
Also assume there is no German unit in K4. It is the start of that Russian's unit rout
When determining the unit's rout destination (nearest in MF non-ignorable woods/building, determined
at start of its RtPh), MUST building K2 be the initially declared rout destination
(nearest non-ignorable woods/building at 2MF away), even though the unit may not
end its RtPh there due to the KEU in J2?
Basically, when determining a valid rout destination at the start of a units rout (A10.51),
does a Known enemy unit IN the same Location as the broken unit at the start of the
RtPh automatically preclude any ADJACENT woods/building from being a valid rout
target, since the broken unit may not END a RtPh there (A10.51)?
ANSWER
K2 must be declared initially; upon reaching K2, the router must re-figure his destination.
....Perry