Houlie
CEO of HoulieDice (TM)
It doesn't seem it gets us much past the 447 for all the points made previously. It feels a bit chrome-ish. I would not vote for adding another counter type with limited incremental value.
What about the Rocket counters?Hello!
No as a few have mentioned....... there is zero need..... does not bring anything to the table..... We have (more than) enough squad types for the germans.....
Peace
Roger
Rocket Counters??????What about the Rocket counters?
Some have posted that Rocket counters might need to be made as well.Rocket Counters??????
Oh OK I did not understand. If there is a need, I have no problem adding counters. It would seem to me that there is not much of a need for rocket counters.Some have posted that Rocket counters might need to be made as well.
Just replying to what someone said.
Just got a shipment in from the Gamer's Armory.....Oh OK I did not understand. If there is a need, I have no problem adding counters. It would seem to me that there is not much of a need for rocket counters.
Do not get me wrong, I am a counter slut. But when it comes to adding squad types, I am in the "we have enough" crowd.
Peace
Roger
Same here. I can take them or leave them.what I find odd is that I am completely indifferent about plane counters. I just do not care if I have all the different FB counters out there.
Roger
Got to say that I'm the opposite. I just loved the Aircraft counters in Operation Cobra and Blood & Jungle from BFP. Those '44 and '45 Aircraft with the rockets really add to the system IMO. I'm always using them too. The Marine aircraft with the rockets are continually being used in my Iwo CG. The extra counters help me keep track of which aircraft have rockets/bombs/napalm. It could get very confusing if I was just using the generic MMP counters.Same here. I can take them or leave them.
I might play a scenario with Air Support every 1 out of 40 scenarios, so I'm completely hohum about all the TPP aircraft counters floating around out there and haven't ever punched one.
heehee.....547's with rockets in their briefs of course.Rocket Counters??????
They were cranking out jet fighters and Tiger tanks, too, but so what? It doesn't mean anything if basic training courses are slashed from 16 weeks to 8 weeks (as they were by 1944), and the draft age is 16 years old. All that means is that when the first Bren Gun, Browning, or DP opens up, every Landser in the squad puts his face in the dirt and waits to throw his hands up when Tommy, Ivan or a G.I. comes running over to mop up. Higher rate of fire is no substitute for training or battle experience.In addition to the MP-44s, the Germans also had some semi-auto rifles, (not too many though), and were still cranking out sub-machineguns in 44 and '45.
Without starting a flame war, thank you for making my point, the 5-4-8 is too strong, a 5-4-7 with an ELR of 2 or 3 would better depict a half trained group with new toys....They were cranking out jet fighters and Tiger tanks, too, but so what? It doesn't mean anything if basic training courses are slashed from 16 weeks to 8 weeks (as they were by 1944), and the draft age is 16 years old. All that means is that when the first Bren Gun, Browning, or DP opens up, every Landser in the squad puts his face in the dirt and waits to throw his hands up when Tommy, Ivan or a G.I. comes running over to mop up. Higher rate of fire is no substitute for training or battle experience.
There's simply very little rationale to increase any of the German squad capabilities in 1944-45 if all you have to point to are a couple of extra machine pistols, when so many of the soft factors suggest that the Germans were making do with much less.
Yep. I agree.:smoke:...the 5-4-8 is too strong, a 5-4-7 with an ELR of 2 or 3 would better depict a half trained group with new toys....
Then get your "Scenario design" cap on Chris and slash something out over the next few months.....Yep. I agree.:smoke: