3MiF Boff vs The Purist - German View

[The Purist]

But maybe something more on the lines of:
1. You (Americans) must complete "X" number of map missions- in this case you'd have to capture X number of bridges and X number of key locations. The Germans would not know exactly where the key locations are or how many bridges are needed.
2. Germans must hold X number of bridges and X number of key locations.
3. Then at the end of the game each sides "misisons" would have to be revealed and victory established based on who best completed their mission.
You might need a moderator at the end just to have an impartial look at the "best completed" part.
It might be worth trying out.
Anyone else have an idea or comment?

I like this idea. It would definitely help prevent ahistorical player behaviour.

 

[Mephisto]

I guess you could go back onto the "stand-by" list!
You just never know... :laugh:

Sounds like a good idea! :salute:

 

[airBiscuit]

A very enjoyable and well-written AAR, Purist. I am glad to see that a bold counterattack strategy paid off. And what a see-saw battle it turned out to be!

The objectives idea Palantir brought up is a compelling one, and as long as everyone agreed to having a moderator review the end of battle and determine victory, this would yield very compelling game play. I also like the idea of double-blind objectives.