Search results

Just now having the opportunity to print some of these sticky errata and update my stuff. I had a question regarding J13 Sticky Errata. There is errata (both normal RB and pocket) for UN Forces Vehicle Listing (POA-CWS-HS Mtv) - originally was listed as fast turret but corrected to ST. However...

How about the different colored corners on the No Smoke, No WP, etc. markers?

Greatly appreciate Vic's quick response. Already took care of me. Great customer service!!

Same for me.

I found it curious the module came with acquisition counters specifically for EACH vehicle/gun on the counter sheets. Is this something we are going to see moving forward with MMP? Seems like a lot of acquisition counters to have to store and deal with.

Just to confirm, these are not designed to fit onto any specific style label (i.e. - 1"x2 5/8", 2" x 4", etc.). You could print them on a full size 8 1/2 x 11 sheet label and cut to fit, correct?

And this is why I have gradually moved back to my pocket rule book rather than eASLRB.

E7.25 (mid-paragraph) Aircraft cannot cause lose of ? or prevent the gaining of ? by "seeing" an enemy unit; aircraft cause ?-loss only by attacking concealed units and scoring at least a PTC result on the IFT (provided that attacked unit is within the LOS of a Good Order enemy ground unit)...

Only drawback to eASLRB, you have to go in and re-highlight and/or add annotations each time it is updated. Not a huge deal, just more an observation. ;)

Hmmm, interesting comment there. I wonder if that was intentional? There has been a lot of discussion about the number of overlays available and there lack of use. Wonder if MMP is going to move to more "open" maps allowing designers to more easily incorporate the use of overlays.

It all depends on the actions of the AFV. If the AFV enters the location (overrun or not) then the unit must voluntarily drop ? or take a PAATC. However, if the AFV enters the location using Bypass or a Woods-Road, ? is retained without PAATC until the AFV ends its MPH in that location.

B32.5 covers Rail Cairs and while they are considered buildings for Ambush and Street Fighting purposes, no mention of them being rally terrain. Also, updated Terrain Chart does not have Rail Cars underlined.

No. The hedge is not really the deciding factor here as I think A6.3 is the rules to be concerned with. U8 is at -1. W8 is 2 hexes away and at Level 0. Since W8 is 2 hexes away, it must be at Level 1 to see into the depression. Only adjacent units can see directly into a depression. Edit -...

I believe no, PRC can not accept prisoners. The first few sentences of A20.21, "...is both ADJACENT to Known, Good Order, armed enemy Infantry/Cavalry..." and continues, "...will surrender to THAT (my emphasis) enemy unit as its prisoner instead,..." Then later in the paragraph, "If the only...

Apologize if this is posted some place else but I was unable to locate the answer. Are all the maps from AP #19 Roads to Rangoon in VASL? Or is there a place to go and download them?

Don't forget about the PAATC. ;)

Now add in the release of ToTR....any chance we see a new version of the Rat Charts?

Sorry to be jumping on this so late but just having time to look through my new DB. Let me make sure I have this correct. The French FT-17C does not have "No IF" on the back side. The previous versions of the Allied Minor and Axis Minor FT-17C(f) did have "No IF" on the back. As Klaus...

Interesting....my VASL has all those vehicles listed under the PC/tr EXCEPT the Peugeot 202 aa. :unsure: Possibly due to my older version of VASL??? (I'm on 6.6.6 and have been meaning to update.)

While we are the subject of the Peugeot 202...where in VASL is the Peugeot 202 with the AAMG (and 4pp capacity)?? Believe it is a 2fp AAMG with a 1 ROF (and maybe a B11).