Search results

It isn't at all clear; scrub or hammada. I'd lean toward scrub because Q7 looks like hammada, but I'd recommend a Perry sez, I'd also ask about K5 and R4

If DD6 units have wall advantage, then yes. If DD6 units do not have wall advantage, then no.

Is this because of the last paragraph of A26.1? "... until the opponent actively gains Control of it."

Doesn't ToTR 3.2 MAX: answer this? "The maximum number... ...purchased per each WFP Table is 3 ..."

Your A4.3 second sentence states "Bypass cannot be used to skirt the edges of any other terrain feature (including gully-woods), nor an obstacle that is Ablaze or contains an armed non-Disrupted (19.12) Known enemy unit." Am I messing something with your question?

I like it, but how do you execute this? Where are the MFs spent? One to step out, two and three to toss the SMOKE grenade, then what (is it free to fall back into your starting location)? Bill beat me to this.

There is a significant difference between the A12.42 rule and the concealment loss chart. And the chart overrules the book rule. Letter A for loss (bold is mine): A If it: becomes broken/Reduced/Wounded/berserk/overstacked/captured, uses Non-Assault Movement, attacks in CC [EXC: an Ambush...

In this situation LOS from Y6 to X4 is blocked because the rubble is inherent terrain and is at the level of the ground on the map (i.e., level 2 in the center of X5 and level 1 around the hill top. But, if there were say a cliff hexside between X5 and Y5 then LOS would be clear.

B26.41 definitely implies that you can continue routing if you have enough MFs.

If Q4 was rubbled at all levels, I think the LOS from P3 Level 1 to R3 is clear. Because Q3 isn't inherent terrain and a LOS string going from P3 Level 1 to R3 is only blocked up to the Q3/Q4 hexside and not across the hexside; since the building isn't visible on both sides of the LOS string...

B13.421 Anytime a fully-tracked AFV enters a woods hex without benefit of Bypass or .... Bypassing AFVs don't leave trailbreaks.

A10.52 are the rules for low crawl, not for routing to the nearest building or woods hex. I don't believe it applies to normal routing, and there is nothing in A10.51 (Direction) that requires "toward" as long as it can reach the destination in one RPh. So, I think it's allowed to use the W9...

Does the SU-100(s) chosen by random selection get marked with a TI marker; does the German player get to know which was chosen? I think the rules A4.8 say they do ("When a unit is affected by TI status it is marked by placing a TI counter on top of it...").

And, I think stairwells still exist so access to the 1st level of buildings with printed stairwells (i.e., two of the victory buildings with only one of them) is via the printed stairwell. Otherwise the SSR typically says 'stairwells don't exist'.

I'm looking for a roommate for Winter Offensive. I have a two double bed room reserved from Thursday to Sunday. If anyone is interested in sharing a room (or even car pooling from the Albany NY area) let me know. Thanks, Brian Wiersma

A23.7 allows setting a DC during play. "...or which was Set and declared during play by an Infantry unit which spent all of its MF (using Hazardous Movement) to Set the DC in its Location during its MPh and made a dr < its US#..." Does this mean that if I have a concealed unit or stack out of...

B19.2 "... or the LOS can be drawn to another gully hex without leaving the combination brown, dark green background." Then, the EX of the same paragraph "... IN E9 cannot see a unit IN G8 because the LOS between the two hex centers extends outside the gully background coloration..." In your...

It appears that specifying terrain type and not using the word 'hex' is the normal convention in the rule book; see Entrenchments and Wire. Minefields appear to be the exception where the word 'hex' is used. So, terrain type implies the hex. As an example, Entrenchments can't be set up on a...

True, it will not lose its concealment; but a dummy stack pretending to be an AFV will be exposed.

You are correct