Recent content by Reepicheep

  1. Reepicheep

    New members introduce yourself here

    Not really new to the forums (since I moderated the original Warfare HQ version and ran the PBEM ladder!), but it's been many years. Considering dusting off my VASL counters, but haven't made any concrete steps towards that yet. Fortunately still have my eASLRB and love the new version of VASL.
  2. Reepicheep

    Basic Tactics Links

    This is not quite correct. A25.23 excludes "a Guard" from from participating in a Human Wave, but this is referring to a unit guarding a prisoner (a Guard). This is quite different from a Guards formation, which A25.2 refers to elite troops as GUARDS (caps). The index also makes the...
  3. Reepicheep

    Avatars

    Hey Gary... you can choose to switch off all avatar's in your User Control Panel.
  4. Reepicheep

    Avatars

    You should see a red "SUBSCRIBE TODAY!" link right up near the top of the forums.
  5. Reepicheep

    Avatars

    Just found the thread. Don said he was working on allowing subscriptions by cheques or credit cards, and to give him a day or so to get it organised.
  6. Reepicheep

    Avatars

    I think Don is looking for a way to allow VIP membership without PayPal.
  7. Reepicheep

    Preferred Screen Resolution

    :surprise: :eek: :crosseye: :eek: :surprise:
  8. Reepicheep

    A19.3 Inexperienced Personnel and Leaders

    The leader exempts the squad in each (a)-(e) situation, so the answer to each EX is "No." Yes. [I don't think there are any instances in ASLSK where this distinction in this rule is meaningful.] Apologies for any previous answers that may conflict with this one. ....Perry MMP
  9. Reepicheep

    PB2 Howards Men

    Does the mention in SSR 3 of PB 2 (Howards Men) that the British are Scenario Defender mean that the Germans are Scenario Attacker and therefore allowed Cloaking? (as would be the case in the equivalent CG Scenario of CG I) <<No.>> Or is there only a Scenario Defender for this scenario...
  10. Reepicheep

    G14.234 and S3.323

    There appears to be a rules conflict in the SASL mission 21 "Beach Defense" where the ENEMY is conducting a Seaborne Assault: G14.234 - Requires enemy to unload from LC as soon as possible S3.323 - Prohibits S? to move into residual of 4FP or greater Question If I fire on the hex the LC is...
  11. Reepicheep

    I have to ask

    So really, we just need some budding scenario designers to step up who can design us some good Yanks vs. Yanks scenarios. Then there'll not be a need for the Germans or the Russians.
  12. Reepicheep

    I have to ask

    The "Yanks running out" quip refers to the fact that MMP have thousands of copies of Yanks sitting in their warehouse. Avalon Hill did a massive reprint of Yanks just before they went bellyup... and MMP inherited this when they took over the ASL line from Hasbro. So it indeed would be big...
  13. Reepicheep

    ABtF AAR!

    Both AARs are up now. :)
  14. Reepicheep

    Cowering and FPF (ASLSK)

    I don't have the SK rules on hand, but unless they say otherwise, sure the Conscript can do a FPF attack... they can be done whenever you're marked with a Final Fire counter and want to fire again at a moving adjacent unit. FP would equal 4 though... standard 4 FP, halved for having already...
  15. Reepicheep

    Ladder Update - November 2004

    Well November is officially over, according to whatever time zone the Warfare HQ server is based in! So no arguments this time about whether the month is over or not! ;) Lots of ladder activity was had this month by all, with a total of 37 games played during November. USWI001 and...
Top