Recent content by MichalS

I am a moderately experienced player who due to family obligations recently started playing PBEM. I can make 4+ logs per week. Being Slovak, I am mainly interested in Slovak or Partisan scenarios (other small nationalities too), as well as scenarios with unusual victory conditions. But I can be...

Dear Paolo, Francesco, Mario and all others - thank you for creating such a warm and friendly atmosphere and contributing to a well organised tournament! It was a pleasure having been able to participate!

I actually find the dice and dice tower rules cited above constructive and the organiser apparently tries to provide equipment for those who do not want to invest into such items. Why they are constructive in my opinion: For those who do care about dice it is a bigger problem that their...

Thank you Paolo, that makes sense. I can confirm that I also witnessed attempts to agree on a scenario (from the provided selection) quickly and without the bidding system. I find your proposed system still gives enough incentive not to deviate from the fixed scenario (as you might lose the...

Does this list imply there will be no scenario bidding?

Anybody willing to share a double room?

Luckily I only have it 4 hrs by train! (I was hoping for a partisan armored train but alas...)

Hi, I am based in Bremen and currently saddled with a newborn, a meet in Hamburg (or Bremen for that matter) for a short scenario could be doable. If not, let's keep in touch!

Hello Torsten, It seems there is a couple of us in the area - I am based in Bremen, Andreas in Bremerhaven, Lars and you, Torsten, north of Hamburg. If we find a suitable location I would be up for occasional meetups or even a regular monthly gaming weekend. Best, Michal

Thank you guys! It looks like I will be well received in the area!

Those are good news. I am moving to Bremen over the next months.

You mean that my "or" is a logical systems language's XOR - and that for the rules text, we might need both. I have no quibble with that. (I think that "or" to mean inclusive* and "OR" to mean exclusive would have been more elegant, but that is not my main argument.) I am saying that in this...

That is indeed correct. To me the formulation with the conjunction is clear, but I understand how it might caused problems for some (I had to discuss this with my opponent who interpreted the VC incorrectly). And I think the cause of the problem - in this particular case - lies partly in the...