Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Members
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
antony.marsh's latest activity
antony.marsh
replied to the thread
Bayonet Charge.
.
Thanks a lot Robin.
Feb 29, 2024
antony.marsh
replied to the thread
Bayonet Charge.
.
Thanks chaps but my understanding is you have to pay for the eASLRB and I though it would be easy just to find the Bayonet Charge rules...
Feb 29, 2024
antony.marsh
posted the thread
Bayonet Charge.
in
Rules & Errata
.
I haven’t got ‘Forgotten War’ where I believe the rules for a Bayonet Charge are written. Is there any way I can access them? Cheers
Feb 28, 2024
antony.marsh
replied to the thread
TI again
.
Okay cheers. Got it but it’s not one of the clearest rules. So a unit cannot fire at it as it declares TI in the MPh but it can fire at...
Feb 16, 2024
antony.marsh
replied to the thread
TI again
.
Cheers all. Hey Scott. From your first compilation example, does that mean that, given that no MF were used, the unit cannot be...
Feb 16, 2024
antony.marsh
posted the thread
TI again
in
Rules & Errata
.
Oops. That does raise the issue of how many times an attacker can fire at it using DFF.
Feb 16, 2024
antony.marsh
replied to the thread
TI
.
Agreed that it’s not Hazardous Movement. Agreed that the unit loses Concealment as in C of chart. So the squad uses no MF. It is just...
Feb 16, 2024
antony.marsh
posted the thread
TI
in
Rules & Errata
.
A concealed squad is in the same woods hex as a known mine and in its MPh declares TI. What are the factors for a 4-4-7 enemy squad that...
Feb 16, 2024
antony.marsh
replied to the thread
AFVs in same hex
.
Quite right Klas, the Carrier was NOT Immobile but hey ho all good fun.
Jan 28, 2024
antony.marsh
replied to the thread
AFVs in same hex
.
Okay. I’ll take your word for it. Rule reference? Cheers
Jan 27, 2024
antony.marsh
replied to the thread
AFVs in same hex
.
Found the reference in MultiMans own errata page! Any further thoughts?
Jan 27, 2024
antony.marsh
replied to the thread
AFVs in same hex
.
Oops, even more replies. Correct Eagle, the Japanese AFV moved into the Carriers hex. It didn’t stop though, it’s actually IN MOTION. Thanks
Jan 27, 2024
antony.marsh
replied to the thread
AFVs in same hex
.
Cheers both. I’m sure I read an errata somewhere that crossed out the ‘or in its own hex’ part of rule D1.81. Could be wrong. And yes...
Jan 27, 2024
antony.marsh
posted the thread
AFVs in same hex
in
Rules & Errata
.
Tricky one this, read several rules/updates. British PFP. A BMG Carrier wants to fire at the same hex Japanese AFV-type 95 that moved...
Jan 27, 2024
Members
Top