Did anyone ever make a set of Tito’s forces?
TAHGC/MMP, the latter especially re the Yugoslav partisan vehicle pieces added in later modules. For rather good reason, MMP has yet to augment/adjust Partisan Infantry pieces though (beyond the Nationalities rules/footnote tweaks suggested as applicable via SSR re some Partisans in some situations -- changes which make the basic Partisan Infantry counters play differently). Per others, TPP products noted upthread too, of course, but these are of limited utility, I expect (more on that below).
Anything old on Yugoslav Partisans would be really outdated, because there was such a paucity of information. We know more now... But even now there's a paucity of information...
Agreed.
Presumably, the “old and outdated” would include the 1990 ASL Annual article by Markuss, which was written specifically for the ASL-playing/designing audience, and which is still useful as a one-stop read.
To paraphrase from the
An90 article:
One "problem" for ASL designers of Partisan actions is that there were so few actions of significance.
On account of terrain, urbanization, and a more civil German occupation policy, partisans in NWE were far less active than elsewhere.
French partisans grew to significant force only in Massif Central and in upper Italy. They were too remote to do much harm from such havens, but were so concentrated as to be subject to German operations (such as the one depicted in scenario A23).
Greek partisans sometimes fought as conventional forces against German sweeps, but lost badly (exchange rates of 19--22 partisan KIAs per German KIA).
Partisans in Yugoslavia spent more energy on genocidal factional fights than on anything else.
There are also "quality problems" w/"historical" accounts of Partisan deeds:
Partisans exaggerated their successes, to attract foreign aid.
German security forces magnified partisan threats, to bid for military resources.
Russians trumped up the accomplishments of pro-Soviet partisans (and belittled those of anti-Soviet groups).
Upshot: there's not much
five-by-five stuff in the "historical" record;
maybe not any.
IMO, that would include the “latest and greatest” published histories, as there still remain political motives for coloring histories (some of which are still directly or indirectly State-funded).
Getting back to the Markuss article:
Secretive French saboteurs are thought to have inflicted greater harms on German resources than did French paramilitary forces.
War in the Shadows - The Partisans in ASL - by Charles Markuss An90p53 said:
Perhaps the greatest contribution made by French partisans was to goad the [Germans, after D-day, into reprisal operations that delayed] the dispatch of the 2nd SS Panzer Division to Normandy for some ten days.
Thus, partisan contributions in the war are hard to gauge, as the records are thought to contain as much inseparable myth as fact.
Some more notes/tidbits from the 1990 Markuss article:
- British commandos fought with partisans in actions against German-held Aegean islands, and in Yugoslavia.
- Many partisans in Russia and the Baltic States fought the Soviets; Ukrainian partisans fought both sides.
- Polish Home Guard units fought Soviets at times; Polish partisans were suppressed by or absorbed into Westward-moving Soviet armies.
- Tito believed that "if you need something, you go out to the road and get it from the Germans."
- The Polish Home Army sent unarmed troops into battle during the Warsaw Uprising to scrounge for weapons from the fallen.
- Poles made grenades from unexploded bombs, shells and Goliaths.
- Officers in Burma organized hill tribesman into partisans armed with Italian rifles, blow pipes, bows and crossbows.
- Britain provided captured Italian stocks to European partisans in 1942--43.
- Britain later airdropped lots of Sten guns because they were very cheap, easy to hide/use/maintain, and could use Axis ammunition.
- Though vast stocks of ammunition were dropped into Europe, most went unrecovered for want of transport.
- By D-Day, most French partisans were armed with just two grenades and a Model 1914 French rifle.
- Poles began the Warsaw Uprising with just three days worth of ammunition, but fought on for 63 days (learning severe fire discipline).
- The Warsaw Uprising was compromised by some troops firing well before the planned time, and by daylight attacks on German strongpoints.
- FFI troops in the Paris Uprising had just one magazine each of SMG ammunition.
- Soviets partisan groups grew increasingly dependent on unwilling draftees; some were executed for unreliability (and their families massacred) [suggesting Commissars may be appropriate in late-war Soviet partisan OBs? WMH].
- Yugoslavians received generous Allied air, ground and naval support at times and, late in the war, British light armor.
- Some Yugoslavian and Greek bands acquired Italian tanks, mortars and guns (complete with crews) after Italy sued for peace.
- Soviet partisans in the early months used armor and guns left in the wake of the German advances.
- To protect rail lines against partisan attacks, the Germans committed a security battalion per 62 miles of rail:
* Trees and undergrowth were cleared for from 400 yards to nine miles of the rail line.
* Unnecessary buildings in the cleared zone were leveled.
* Small fortresses with tall towers gave a view of the line and approaches.
* Four men patrolled each 1.5 miles. The rest of the battalion acted as a ``fire brigade'' reserve.
* Cars filled with sand (hostages, in Greece and Yugoslavia) were coupled ahead of engines to detonate mines (partisans countered by use of remote-control charges).
* Cargo trains dispatched in mutually supporting convoys with armed troops aboard.
* Special trains (some armored) patrolled the rails carrying cavalry and obsolete AFVs (for pursuits) while infantry patrols swept the ground astride the rails.
- Italian partisans, at first disdained, won respect for their work with Allied units as scouts and screening forces.
- Japanese forces faced partisan opposition from:
* Burmese tribesmen under loose British control,
* Australian/Dutch stragglers on Timor,
* cannibal tribesmen on New Guinea, and
* Philippine partisan groups on Leyte, Luzon and Mindanao.
[Re the OP, re seeking a "new" ASL Partisan OOB for use in lieu of the generic 337 & 527 set already included, there simply was no standardization of forces, even within a region — IMO, any attempt to “improve” on the ASL generic OB would necessarily be scenario-specific w/little historical applicability to other actions.]
In summary it looks to me that ASL Partisan scenarios are all storied recollection and embellishment/disparagement as opposed to well-recorded battle accounts justly modeled within ASL. Nor do I see that ever changing.
Simply put, re WWII Partisan actions, true historical accounts do not quite exist — just claims and impressions.
But that has been kind of
enough for (inspired but mostly a-historical) scenarios of entertainment value within the ASL game system.